Fall volatility favors gold

In this article, Russ Koesterich discusses the merits of increasing one’s allocation to gold ahead of the potential for some seasonal volatility in the fall.

Key Takeaways

• Russ argues that a 2-4% strategic allocation to gold is still warranted and notes that historically, gold tends to outperform stocks when volatility rises - which often occurs in the fall.
• While volatility is currently trading at its lowest level since February, upping one’s exposure to gold in the short-term can serve as a risk management tool and lock in potential gains as we head into the latter half of the year.

After a difficult start, stocks are back to their winning ways. The S&P 500 continues to advance and is now up a respectable 10% year-to-date. While alternative strategies worked in the first quarter, since May investors have done best rotating back into U.S. equities. While I still believe stocks will end the year higher, we are entering a time of year when volatility tends to rise. Given this short-term dynamic, I would advocate adding a bit more gold to portfolios.

I last spoke about gold in May. At the time, I was less focused on gold’s short-term value as a hedge, which is mixed, and more motivated by gold’s role as a long-term store-of-value against runaway deficits and legitimate questions about the dollar. Both factors still argue for a strategic allocation, which I’d define as around 2-4%. That said, in the short-term there may be an argument for taking the allocation towards the upper end of the range. If volatility rises, as it typically does in the fall, gold tends to post strong relative performance versus stocks.

Calmer Waters

Consistent with a year of rapidly changing themes, equity market volatility, as measured by the VIX Index, has traded in a particularly wide range. March witnessed a violent spike, taking volatility to multi-year highs, only for the surge to reverse at a record pace. Recently, volatility has collapsed, with the VIX Index trading below 15, the lowest level since February (see Chart 1).

Chart 1

The key point in the relationship between gold, stocks and volatility: Even a modest uptick in equity market volatility can favor gold. Looking back at the past fifteen years, there has been a very consistent relationship between how gold performs relative to stocks and weekly or monthly changes in implied volatility.

Take the most recent period, in which gold has lagged as volatility fell. The reverse holds true as well. Based on weekly data from Bloomberg, in weeks when the VIX rises, gold outperforms the S&P 500 by an average of roughly 1%. The greater the spike in volatility, the greater the outperformance. A 20% spike in volatility has historically been associated with an average weekly outperformance of 3%; in the rare instances when the VIX spiked 50% or more, the average outperformance for gold is more than 5%.

Temporary Buffer

In addition to the turn of the season, investors might want to incorporate a bit of a buffer given the unusually calm pall that has descended over markets. Regardless of the asset class – stocks, Treasuries, currencies – volatility is bouncing around the lows for the year, suggesting investors are not particularly focused on hedging their accumulated gains. A short-term trade in gold may help preserve those gains in what is turning out to be a decent year.

To obtain more information on the fund(s) including the Morningstar time period ratings and standardized average annual total returns as of the most recent calendar quarter and current month end, please click on the fund tile.

The Morningstar Rating^TM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure (excluding any applicable sales charges) that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.