Three reasons why surging stocks caution patience and discretion

Investor enthusiasm may have returned, but Russ Koesterich, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager of Global Allocation emphasizes a more prudent approach.

So far 2023 has been the mirror image of 2022. Last year featured a broad selloff in stocks and a spike in interest rates. This year has witnessed the exact opposite: stocks have surged, starting with last year’s worst performers, and both nominal and real interest rates have dropped (see Chart 1).

Today, potential market headwinds are of a different sort. Rising prices of goods and services and their impact on both interest rates and profit margins have become the larger concern. The good news is that rising inflation does not necessarily mean the end of the bull market. However, the shift in the macro backdrop does necessitate a shift in security selection. Investors now need to ensure enough exposure to those stocks likely to benefit from accelerating inflation.

Equity performance - year to date

Chart image

Source: Refinitiv Datastream, MSCI and BlackRock Investment Institute. Feb 02, 2023
Notes: The bars show the performance of MSCI country indexes in U.S. – dollar terms year to date. The dots show the performance in local currency. The markets shown are the largest 25 by market cap as of June 2015

Back in mid-October I suggested that the market was in the process of bottoming, but that the bottom would look different than the ‘V’ shaped bottom that defined the 2020 lows. So far, the market has broadly stuck to that script. Stocks bottomed in October but many parts of the market, particularly growth stocks, revisited those lows in December.

Going forward, three issues suggest patience and discretion:

Fuller valuations. In general, on a global basis equity valuations look reasonable. The MSCI World Index is trading at approximately 16x forward earnings, slightly below the long-term average. However, the rally has left U.S. valuations somewhat more stretched. The S&P 500 is currently valued at nearly 19x 2023 earnings. While this is well below the cyclical peak, it is hard to describe U.S. equities as cheap.

Vulnerable earnings. Adding to the near-term caution: valuations may be richer than they appear if earnings fail to meet still optimistic expectations. While earnings revisions have turned negative, they may have further to fall as the economy continues to decelerate and consumers pull back from giddy post-pandemic spending.

The technical nature of the January rally. The final reason for caution is rooted in the nature of the rally. The Nasdaq 100 has advanced 20% from the January low. Yet, even those gains pale in comparison to the advances in the most volatile segments of the market. For example, with crypto currencies up approximately 50% from the fall lows, crypto exchanges have surged, in some cases more than doubling. The gains in these names can largely be attributed to short covering, with the most shorted names posting the sharpest gains. While this has provided a sugar rush to many parts of the market, it is unlikely to drive returns throughout the remainder of the year.

Be patient and emphasize GARP

The bottom line: Rather than chase the rally, I would instead emphasize patience, avoiding the more speculative parts of the market and emphasizing growth conditioned on price.

Stocks can go higher but in near-term, particularly when it comes to lower quality, volatile names. Instead, consider adding to parts of the market that have underperformed, such as high-quality names in healthcare, agriculture and select industrials. Finally, while growth may continue to outperform in a softening economy, investors should avoid paying any price. Interestingly, GARP, or growth at a reasonable price, names have outperformed the broader market and mostly kept up with broader growth indices. In my mind this is a better place to put new money to work.

An investment built for all generations

Explore how the Fund's diversified approach has grown a $10k investment since inception in 1989.
Explore Global Allocation products

To obtain more information on the fund(s) including the Morningstar time period ratings and standardized average annual total returns as of the most recent calendar quarter and current month-end, please click on the fund tile.

The Morningstar Rating for funds, or "star rating," is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.

Russ Koesterich
Russ Koesterich
Portfolio Manager
Russ Koesterich, CFA, is a Portfolio Manager for BlackRock's Global Allocation Fund and the lead portfolio manager on the GA Selects model portfolio strategies.