Private Market

Unlocking private markets with Jon Diorio

A person wearing a bright yellow jacket and winter hat stands on a rocky ground facing a massive wall of blue and white ice. The figure is small in comparison to the towering glacier, emphasizing the scale of the icy landscape.
Mar 25, 2026|ByJonathan Diorio

Jon Diorio, Head of Alternatives for U.S. Wealth, offers insights into private markets trends and strategies to help you seek better diversification and new sources of return for your clients.

As private markets have grown larger in size and recognition, and more advisors are adding private assets to client portfolios - I often get asked the question ‘what’s next for private markets?’ Looking into 2026, I have six insights to share.

Jon Diorio

6 Insights for 2026

1. Advisors now have easier ways to remedy under-allocations to private markets

Advisors are adopting the use of private markets in client portfolios at a faster pace. More than half of respondents in our 2026 Advisor Trends Survey indicated that they were allocating to private markets in their client portfolios. But despite record flows into private markets in 2025 and a continued roll-out of new and easier ways to access them, advisors’ portfolio allocations remain lower than we would expect, averaging just 7%.

Why might allocations lag? I see a couple reasons. For one, investing in a private asset can be a cumbersome process. Suitability reviews, subscription documents, and tender offer mechanics are often paperwork intensive and iterative, consuming a significant amount of time and resources. But a more important – and addressable – reason is that most advisors do not feel confident with the complexity of implementing private markets in client portfolios. 68% of survey respondents expressed a need for additional education on portfolio construction involving private assets.

Adding private strategies alongside mutual funds and ETFs in the same account or model can be particularly challenging as transparency and liquidity limitations complicate the due diligence process for some private assets. Without true whole-portfolio integration, user experiences fragment and advisors may be challenged to deliver outcomes their clients are seeking. Today’s technology-enabled model portfolios, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and innovative fund structures make it easier for advisors to deliver private markets to their clients consistently and at scale.

2. Private markets may be a path to long-term wealth creation.

Long-term investors can find new opportunities in private markets to potentially enhance returns and improve portfolio outcomes. BlackRock’s Capital Market Assumptions project private equity, infrastructure and direct lending as top return drivers in portfolios over the next 10 years. Eligible investors can see BlackRock’s Capital Markets Assumptions here.

Other research from BlackRock suggests that portfolios that have intentionally integrated private market investments alongside public investments have the potential to enhance portfolio efficiency. Read the ‘Seizing the model moment’ whitepaper here.

3. Private market exposure can broaden the opportunity set as public markets see increased concentration

Many client portfolios are starting 2026 overly concentrated and potentially overexposed to large cap public stocks on the back of a historic run up. While public stocks may continue to rally in 2026, it may be time to broaden the opportunity set for client portfolios.

Risk has been concentrating in public markets due to recent growth in mega cap technology stocks and a shrinking number of public stocks over the past decade as private companies stay private longer. Among the number of total listed companies, the 20 largest names now represent greater than 30 percent of the market capitalization versus just under 14 percent in 2015. (See Exhibit 1)

Chart showing public stocks have become increasingly concentrated

Source: Preqin Insights+, Aladdin, MSCI. Data as of November 2025. Based on the Market Capitalization of the MSCI ACWI IMI. For illustrative purposes only. Asset allocation and diversification strategies do not guarantee a profit and may not protect against loss. Indexes are unmanaged and index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Private markets offer access to smaller companies, which may have greater runways for potential growth. Comparing the distribution of enterprise values (EV) of companies acquired by private equity funds in 2024 against market capitalizations of global stock constituents of the MSCI ACWI IMI shows a significant difference in opportunities by company size.

More than 64% of private company deals in 2024 involved companies valued below $1 billion, while less than 3% of deals involved companies sized comparably to mega cap stocks at $10 billion+. Choosing the right private markets strategies may help advisors access differentiated return streams and the future drivers of economic growth.

Chart showing Private equity offers more opportunities in smaller companies, which have a higher growth potential.

*Private equity deals in 2024: Enterprise value at entry
** Market capitalization at the end of 2024 for constituents of the MSCI ACWI IMI
Source: Preqin, Aladdin, MSCI. Data as of November 2025. For illustrative purposes only.

Private equity, however, is not a monolith and there can be significant dispersion in returns. Manager and investment selection and the ability to drive returns through operational value-add and execution significantly influence private equity outcomes. Dispersion in private markets can be an advantage for the right manager, but selection is key.

While median Private equity returns remain constant, interdecile ranges show wide dispersion

The figures shown also relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Source: BlackRock Investment Institute with data from LCD Pitchbook. Note: The chart shows median, interquartile and interdecile ranges of the internal rate of return for U.S. private equity vintages in a universe of U.S. private equity funds created by Pitchbook.

4. A pickup in IPO and M&A could provide a tailwind for private markets

In 2026, we may see a more favorable interest rate environment for M&A and IPO activity, which may impact liquidity and return potential in private equity and event-driven strategies. Additionally, supportive policy and rapid technological developments widen the scope for strategic deal-making, which could lead to a larger, higher-quality pipeline for M&A. Taken together, these conditions can be conducive to a rebound in private equity performance relative to public stocks.

Historically, private equity has rebounded following periods of underperformance relative to public large cap stocks and having recently seen a record three-year period for underperformance, private equity may be due for a rebound.

Private equity may be due for a rebound versus public stocks

Source: BlackRock, Morningstar, The Burgiss Group LLC as of 12/31/24. Average annual 3-year rolling returns are used as an example of “longer-term” returns given the relatively short timeframe of data available for private markets. Additionally, average 1-year returns are not used as an illustration as investors tend to hold these strategies for longer than 1 year given the illiquid nature of many private market investments. The rolling 3-year periods shown here are based on quarterly start dates. Asset class comparison is used to demonstrate private market performance compared to public market performance during comparable time periods. There are material differences in individual index/ manager universe methodologies (both public and private) and differences in the way public and private market performance is calculated; the comparisons shown may not fully reflect these differences. Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in the index. Performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses.

After a period of subdued activity in the global private equity market, 2025 brought some indications of a potential recovery. In 2026, with the potential of lower policy interest rates, continued convergence on valuations between buyers and sellers of assets, and an ongoing structural shift in allocations from public to private markets, I believe we could see the beginning of a new cycle.1

Private equity has historically rebounded following periods of underperformance

Source: BlackRock, Morningstar, The Burgiss Group LLC as of 12/31/24. The rolling 3-year periods shown here are based on quarterly start dates. Asset class comparison is used to demonstrate private market performance compared to public market performance during comparable time periods. There are material differences in individual index/ manager universe methodologies (both public and private) and differences in the way public and private market performance is calculated; the comparisons shown may not fully reflect these differences. Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in the index. See footnote in Exhibit 4 for more information.

5. Putting credit in context: credit markets have endured headline turmoil before

The global private credit market has rapidly expanded over the past decade, reaching an estimated $2.2 trillion in assets under management in 2025.2 The asset class has surpassed the size of the U.S. high yield bond market at $1.5 trillion, but there may be other parallels between these two credit markets as today’s headlines stoke fears about idiosyncratic private credit markdowns as we saw in the high yield market just over a decade ago.

In 2015, U.S. high yield credit spreads widened sharply (above 7%) as oil prices slumped and mounting liquidity concerns came to a head when a mutual fund limited shareholder redemptions. The Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index ended 2015 down roughly -4.6%, but stabilized and delivered a solid +17.4% return in 2016 and another +7.4% in 2017, respectively. The Cliffwater Direct Lending Index delivered positive total returns of 5.5% in 2015 followed by 11.2% and 8.6% returns in 2026 and 2017, respectively. The performance of both markets underscores how turmoil spurred by short-term credit concerns can be quickly followed by strong returns in the longer term.3

I still believe in the long-term opportunity in private credit despite the idiosyncratic risks dominating the current headlines. Historically private credit has offered a return premium over public credit reflecting the borrower’s willingness to pay a premium for certainty of execution, tailored deal structuring, and an illiquidity premium earned over a longer time horizon. (Exhibit 6)

U.S. direct lending has historically offered a yield “pick-up” vs. public markets

Source: Cliffwater LLC, Bloomberg, Morningstar / LSTA, Pitchbook LCD. Private debt, leveraged loan and high yield as of 3Q2025. Chart shows yield-to-maturity for all three indices. The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.

I take a similar long-term view when assessing risk in private credit. Looking at trailing 12-month loss rates over the last 20 years, private credit loss rates are broadly in line with leveraged loans and high yield. (Exhibit 7). In recent years, more limited lender protections or covenants in leveraged loan documents have created more dispersion in capital preservation between broadly syndicated loans and private credit.

I see private credit as a strategic allocation for investors seeking income over the long term, rather than an opportunity for tactical trading based on market swings.

Realized losses in private credit track the syndicated markets

Source: Cliffwater, JP Morgan, BlackRock. For the CDLI, we show annual and trailing 12-month realized loss rate data for 3Q2025 (most recent available). Realized gains in the CDLI can be driven by equity stubs, warrants, and gains on exited investments. These were more common in 2005-2007, when second lien and mezzanine loans were a greater portion of the CDLI. For USD Leveraged Loans and High Yield, we show implied loss rates based on JPM’s actual par-weighted default and recovery rates.

6. Persistent macro uncertainty, geopolitical risk and stock dispersion call for greater diversification

BlackRock Investment Institute’s 2026 Global Outlook suggests traditional portfolio diversifiers like long-term Treasuries may not offer the portfolio ballast they once did. Investors on the hunt for other portfolio hedges have shown a revived interest in gold; however, I see a further need for other long-term strategic hedges to fixed income, or what we like to call ‘diversifying your diversifiers’.

Against a backdrop of diverging earnings trajectories, policy shifts, and other uncertain macro dynamics, investors don’t have many easy passive options for diversification. Instead of spreading risk indiscriminately, investors may diversify more effectively by owning their risks more deliberately. Consider allocating to hedge funds or liquid alternative strategies that seek to take advantage of volatility and dispersion using a more granular active approach.

Additional resources

Questions?

To learn more, reach our team at 609-282-0050 or altshelp@blackrock.com

Download full report

Jon Diorio
BlackRock’s Head of Alternatives for U.S. Wealth