
Learn how rising S&P 500 concentration affects portfolios and how iShares Build ETFs can help fine-tune mega-cap exposure and manage concentration risk.
Why many portfolios have less exposure to mega-cap stocks
The shape of the U.S. equity market has evolved, with mega-cap stocks and sector concentration reaching historic highs. The top 20 companies of the S&P 500 now account for 49% of the index3 and contributed 64% to its five-year return.4
However, 83% of U.S. asset manager (AM) moderate models are underweight mega-caps5 and the average financial advisor model is ~7% underweight large caps compared to their respective benchmarks.6 These underweights may reflect strategic tilts such as favoring smaller caps for diversification, growth potential, opportunities for excess returns in less efficient markets, or using equal-weight approaches that may reduce mega-cap exposure and increase allocations to smaller companies.
However, mega-cap underweights are often unintentional, stemming from benchmark drift rather than deliberate portfolio decisions. This may reflect the usage of active funds to access large-cap exposure, as 63% of U.S. large blend active funds are underweight mega-cap names.7 The underweight may reflect diversification limits that cap aggregate company weights, as well as active managers differentiating from passive index strategies by maintaining a more balanced market cap allocation. As a result, advisors relying on active funds for large-cap exposure may inadvertently underweight mega-cap stocks.
How mega-cap exposure may impact portfolio risk and returns
Mega-cap companies have continued to drive market performance, supported by strong fundamentals and durable competitive advantages. The top 20 names in the S&P 500 delivered 10.5% revenue growth over the past year— nearly double that of the next 480.8 And 15 of these companies hold wide economic moats, characterized by high network effects, substantial intangible assets, cost advantages, high switching costs, or efficient scale.9
Furthermore, with Technology and Financials representing ~62% of the top 20 names,10 2025 returns for these sectors were driven by earnings growth rather than valuation expansion (Fig. 1).11
Given this backdrop, underexposure to mega-cap stocks may cause investors to leave potential returns on the table and efforts to diversify away from them could represent larger active calls. Over the last year, the S&P 500 rose 18% vs. 11% for its equal-weighted counterpart.12
Fig. 1: U.S. sources of return
Figure 1: Refinitiv, as of 12/31/25. Sectors as represented by S&P 500 GICS sector classification indices. Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. Index performance does not reflect any management fees or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
At the same time, market leadership comes with important trade-offs. Valuation and concentration risk remain key considerations as investor exposure becomes increasingly reliant on a small group of companies. The largest 20 stocks in the S&P 500 have also exhibited higher total risk in 2025 relative to the broader index,13 underscoring the need for thoughtful monitoring as investors balance the benefits of mega-cap leadership against the potential for heightened volatility.
The bottom line is that all investors may want to review their portfolios for mega-cap positioning and many may want to fine-tune exposure to mega caps to reflect their views.
The iShares Build ETF Suite provides a flexible set of tools to fine-tune exposure across the U.S. large-cap universe. By segmenting the S&P 500 into building blocks, iShares Build ETFs empower investors to adjust mega-cap positioning as market conditions, valuation perspectives, or risk appetites evolve.
Figure 2: As of 12/31/25. For illustrative purposes only. Subject to change.
The following case studies show how iShares Build ETFs can help investors adjust mega-cap positioning in U.S. equities across a range of portfolio needs.
1. Closing the mega-cap gap with TOPT: The average asset manager (AM) moderate model is less exposed to mega-cap stocks relative to broad benchmarks like the MSCI ACWI IMI (Fig.3).14 Adding the iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) could close an underweight to mega-cap stocks more efficiently by requiring a smaller portfolio allocation than an S&P 500 fund used for the same purpose. Note, the hypothetical alternative portfolio will still differ geographically from the MSCI ACWI IMI.
Fig. 3: Consider adding TOPT to help more efficiently close the mega-cap underweight
Figure 3: Morningstar, as of 12/31/25 or most recent portfolio date. Mega caps represented by Morningstar’s “Giant” Market Cap Category. Relative to the MSCI ACWI IMI Index. Geographical breakdowns of MSCI ACWI IMI and hypothetical alternative portfolios may differ.
2. Rebuilding the S&P 500 using OEF and XOEF: The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and the iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) can be used as modular building blocks to construct the S&P 500, helping provide greater control and precision over mega-cap exposure.
3. Reduce or increase AI exposure within the S&P 500: The iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) can reduce exposure to AI companies, resulting in ~8% AI exposure versus ~33% in the iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV) (Fig. 4).15
Fig. 4: Use iShares Build ETFs to dial up or down exposure to AI within the S&P 500
Figure 4: BlackRock and Morningstar as of 12/31/25. Subject to change. ARTY and BAI holdings are used as a proxy for AI exposure. 8% AI exposure in XOEF represents the weight of XOEF holdings that are in ARTY and BAI. 33% AI exposure in the S&P 500 Index represents the weight of the S&P 500 Index holdings that are in ARTY and BAI.
4. Diversifying concentrated single-stock positions: Investors can consider harvesting losses from concentrated single stock mega-cap positions and reallocating to the iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT), reducing reliance on individual stock outcomes in a market where dispersion has been high.
5. Managing mega-cap concentration risk: Investors seeking to reduce concentration risk while maintaining exposure to large-cap equities can shift a portion of their S&P 500 exposure to the iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC). TOPC’s index caps holdings in the S&P 500 to 3%, reining in tech and mega-cap exposure while seeking to keep the risk-return profile and tracking error close to the S&P 500 compared to equal-weight strategies.
We believe as the market continues to evolve. maintaining a deliberate and dynamic approach to mega-cap exposure is becoming increasingly more important. The dominance of technology and other mega-cap stocks has redefined the structure of U.S. equity performance, creating both opportunities and concentration risks for investors. The iShares Build ETF Suite provides a flexible toolkit to help investors as they seek to capture key market returns drivers while managing concentration risk.