Tax

Alpha Through an After-Tax Lens

Clock ringing
Oct 09, 2026

Market cap-weighted indexes have been a high hurdle for active managers. From an after-tax lens perspective, capital gains distributions may create a second hurdle, as advisors seek to not only find alpha but help investors keep more of it. Wider dispersion within equities may be expanding the opportunity to clear both, and for active strategies delivered in a pooled vehicle, the wrapper may matter as much as the strategy.

Key Takeaways

  • Market cap-weighted indexes have been a difficult hurdle for active managers, particularly when market leadership has been concentrated in the largest stocks.
  • For taxable investors, the index hurdle is higher still, as capital gains distributions may reduce after-tax returns.
  • Wider stock-level dispersion can create a richer opportunity set for active security selection and may also offer tax-loss harvesting opportunities.
  • Structure matters: over the past five years, active ETFs have generally been more tax efficient than their mutual fund counterparts.1
  • Active ETFs like DYNF and THRO show what's possible. Both ETFs have outperformed more than 90% of large blend funds over the past three years on an after-tax basis.
  • The after-tax toolkit can extend beyond active ETFs, with ETFs like TOPT and QTOP helping investors broaden concentrated mega-cap exposure while SMAs can offer more customized, year-round tax management.

The uncomfortable truth for active: indexing is a high hurdle

Indexing has earned its place in portfolios. In a market where performance has been heavily influenced by a small group of mega-cap leaders, broad market-cap-weighted exposure has been difficult to beat. Through August 2026, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, IVV, outperformed 81% of large blend funds over the past five years, ranked against 1127 funds.2 This is the first hurdle actively managed strategies come up against - before considering taxes, indexes themselves have been unusually strong competitors.

Taxes can reduce already hard-to-find alpha

Even when active managers outperform cap weighted indices, taxable investors may not receive the full benefit. Capital gains distributions can erode returns, stacking a second hurdle on top of the first. Over the past year, the tax drag for large blend funds has been nearly 2%.3

Bar chart showing annualized pre-tax and post-tax pre-liquidation returns over the 1-, 3- and 5-year periods for Morningstar’s U.S. Large Blend category.

Source: Morningstar, as of August 31 2026. Based on annualized pre-tax and post-tax pre-liquidation returns over the 1-, 3- and 5-year periods for Morningstar’s U.S. Large Blend category.

Dispersion has created an opportunity

Headline numbers for index performance can look strong even when the experience beneath the surface is far more uneven. Despite the S&P 500 returning 13% YTD through August, 38% of stocks within the index are in the red, with 115 stocks down more than 10%.

Bar chart showing distribution of S&P 500 constituent YTD returns, calculated by grouping individual stock returns into the return ranges shown. Each bar represents the number of stocks within the respective return range, collateral and futures carry no return and are excluded.

Source: Morningstar, as of August 31 2026. Distribution of S&P 500 constituent YTD returns, calculated by grouping individual stock returns into the return ranges shown. Each bar represents the number of stocks within the respective return range, collateral and futures carry no return and are excluded.

This type of dispersion can make the opportunity set more dynamic and create more room for active managers to add value through security selection.

ETFs may reduce potential tax drag

Two managers running similar strategies may deliver meaningfully different after-tax outcomes depending on the wrapper utilized. Over the past five years, active ETFs have generally exhibited more tax efficiency when compared to their mutual fund counterparts.

bar chart showing Avg % of payers = avg % of funds that have paid out cap gains in each year from 2021-2025. Median cap gain distribution as a % of NAV = median cap gain distribution from 2021-2025.

Source: Morningstar Direct, as of 31 December 2025. Avg % of payers = avg % of funds that have paid out cap gains in each year from 2021-2025. Median cap gain distribution as a % of NAV = median cap gain distribution from 2021-2025. Analysis includes U.S. mutual funds and U.S.-listed ETFs with available NAVs as of 30 November 2025 in each applicable year. Mutual fund universe includes only oldest share class funds. Past distribution not indicative of future distributions.

Put simply, the wrapper doesn't generate alpha — but it can influence how much of it is kept by an investor.

Active MF

Active ETF

Potential alpha

Capital gains distributions often create additional hurdles

Potential alpha

ETF architecture may help reduce capital gains distributions

All regulated investment companies, including ETFs, are obliged to distribute portfolio gains to shareholders by year-end. Trading shares of ETFs may also generate tax consequences and transaction expenses. Certain traditional mutual funds can also be tax efficient.

Active ETFs that have cleared the index hurdle

Investors may have defaulted to S&P 500 ETFs like IVV for large blend exposure precisely because the index has been so hard to beat when combined with the potential for greater tax efficiency of the ETF wrapper as compared to a traditional mutual fund. But if the bar has been set there, there are some active ETFs that still stand out.

Over the past three years, IVV outperformed 78% of large blend funds on an after-tax basis.4 Over that same period, the iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and the iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) each outperformed more than 90% of large blend funds on an after-tax basis. While THRO's track record does not yet span five years, DYNF's does — and on an after-tax basis, it has outperformed 97% of the category over that period.

Bar chart showing post-tax pre-liquidation annualized returns over a 3-year period for Morningstar’s U.S. Large Blend category.

Source: Morningstar, as of August 31, 2026. Data reflects the percentage of funds in Morningstar’s U.S. Large Blend category that have been outperformed over the 1-, 3- and 5-year periods based on after-tax returns. The Morningstar U.S. Large Blend category consisted of 1,322 funds for the 1-year period, 1,211 funds for the 3-year period and 1,127 funds for the 5-year period. After-tax returns are pre-liquidation and assume the highest federal marginal tax rates in effect at the time of each distribution; they do not reflect state or local taxes, or the impact of taxes on the sale of fund shares. Percentage of peer funds outperformed is calculated as 100% minus each fund’s respective Morningstar category rank for the period shown. Peer rankings are relative to the applicable Morningstar category universe and may change over time. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Percentile rankings tell part of the story. On an after-tax return basis, both funds also outpaced IVV over the trailing three-year period.

Bar chart showing After-tax returns are pre-liquidation and assume the highest federal marginal tax rates in effect at the time of each distribution; they do not reflect state or local taxes, or the impact of taxes on the sale of fund shares.

Source: Morningstar Direct, as of August 31 2026. After-tax returns are pre-liquidation and assume the highest federal marginal tax rates in effect at the time of each distribution; they do not reflect state or local taxes, or the impact of taxes on the sale of fund shares. Data is based on post-tax pre-liquidation annualized returns over a 1-, 3- and 5-annualized returns period for Morningstar’s U.S. Large Blend category.

Performance data represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate with market conditions and may be lower or higher when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from the performance shown. For most recent month-end performance and standardized performance, click the following tickers: IVV, DYNF, THRO.

Extending the after-tax toolkit beyond active ETFs

The same stock-level volatility that can create opportunities for active security selection may also create tax-loss harvesting opportunities for investors. This is particularly relevant today, as many portfolios have become increasingly concentrated in a handful of mega-cap stocks and several of those stocks are down more than 15% YTD.⁵ For investors who own those stocks directly, the recent pullback may create opportunities to harvest losses while remaining aligned with their broader investment objectives.

That’s where TOPT and QTOP can fit. TOPT owns the top 20 stocks in the S&P 500, while QTOP owns the top 30 stocks in the Nasdaq-100. Rather than transitioning from a single stock into a broad market-cap-weighted allocation, investors can use these ETFs to broaden single-stock concentration into a basket of mega-cap leaders.

Importantly, TOPT and QTOP are not active ETFs — they are index ETFs. The point here isn't about alpha; it's that the ETF structure itself can help investors make more intentional transitions in taxable portfolios, moving from concentrated single-stock risk to more precise exposures while staying aligned with the portfolio view.

For clients who need more customization, SMA solutions can extend the tax-aware lens further. Direct indexing through tax-managed SMAs gives investors ownership of individual securities, providing greater flexibility to personalize exposures, tailor portfolios to individual preferences and manage portfolio transitions in a tax-aware manner. This more customized approach can complement the benefits offered by the ETF wrapper.

In today’s environment, it’s important to focus not just on finding alpha, but also on understanding how taxes may affect investment outcomes. Investors should consider the tax implications of their investment decisions in consultation with their tax advisors when constructing and managing portfolios. Explore the full suite of after-tax solutions offered by BlackRock here.

Daniel Bush, CFA
Senior iShares Product Consultant
Daniel Bush, CFA, is a senior member of the iShares Product Consulting team within BlackRock’s Global Product Solutions business. He is responsible for delivering deep investment and product expertise across the full iShares platform to clients spanning wealth, institutional, and end-investors.

Performance data represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate with market conditions and may be lower or higher when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from the performance shown. For most recent month-end performance see www.iShares.com. For standardized performance and more information on Morningstar Ratings, including other time periods covered, click on fund cards above.

The Morningstar RatingTM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure (excluding any applicable sales charges) that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.

FAQ:

  • Many investors focus on pre-tax returns, but taxes can have a meaningful impact on what clients ultimately keep. For example, in taxable accounts, capital gains distributions may reduce after-tax outcomes, making it important to evaluate both performance and the potential for greater tax efficiency.

  • Dispersion refers to the difference in performance between individual stocks. When performance varies widely across companies, active managers may have greater opportunities to add value through security selection. Higher dispersion may also create more opportunities for tax-loss harvesting.

  • The ETF structure can help improve after-tax outcomes by reducing the likelihood that the fund distributes taxable capital gains to shareholders, as compared to their traditional mutual fund counterparts. This may help allow investors to retain more of their investment returns.

  • Many investors use broad market ETFs like IVV because of their strong performance and the potential for greater tax efficiency than their mutual fund counterparts. DYNF and THRO demonstrate that some active ETFs have been able to compete with that hurdle, delivering strong relative after-tax results versus both peers and broad market benchmarks.

  • Investors with significant single-stock exposure may be able to use tools such as TOPT, QTOP and tax-managed SMA solutions to diversify positions, broaden exposure beyond a single holding and manage portfolio transitions, remaining aligned with their broader investment views, while also considering tax-aware implementation strategies where appropriate.