iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
- NAV as ofAug 10, 2026
- $51.5952 WK: 41.24 - 51.91
- 1 Day NAV Change as ofAug 10, 2026
- Decrease $
-0.07(-0.13%)
- NAV Total Return as ofAug 07, 2026
- YTD: Increase
19.33%
- 30 Day SEC Yield as ofJul 31, 2026
- 4.55%
- 12m Trailing Yield as ofJul 31, 2026
- 4.37%
- Expense Ratio:Fees as stated in the prospectus
- 0.49%
- Morningstar Rating
- 3 stars
- Morningstar Medalist Rating
- NAV as ofAug 10, 2026
- $51.5952 WK: 41.24 - 51.91
- 1 Day NAV Change as ofAug 10, 2026
- Decrease $
-0.07(-0.13%)
- NAV Total Return as ofAug 07, 2026
- YTD: Increase
19.33%
- 30 Day SEC Yield as ofJul 31, 2026
- 4.55%
- 12m Trailing Yield as ofJul 31, 2026
- 4.37%
- Expense Ratio:Fees as stated in the prospectus
- 0.49%
- Morningstar Rating
- 3 stars
- Morningstar Medalist Rating
The iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF seek to track an index composed of relatively high dividend yielding stocks in the developed Asia Pacific market. The fund offers a way to pursue income through exposure to dividend-focused equities in the Asia/Pacific region.
Key Facts
Portfolio Characteristics
This information must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. For standardized performance, please see the Performance section.
Holdings
Holdings are subject to change.
The values shown for “market value,” “weight,” and “notional value” (the “calculated values”) are based off of a price provided by a third-party pricing vendor for the portfolio holding and do not reflect the impact of systematic fair valuation (“the vendor price”). The vendor price is not necessarily the price at which the Fund values the portfolio holding for the purposes of determining its net asset value (the “valuation price”). Holdings data shown reflects the investment book of record, which may differ from the accounting book of record used for the purposes of determining the Net Assets of the Fund. Notional value represents the portfolio's exposures based on the economic value of investments and options are delta-adjusted. Additionally, where applicable, foreign currency exchange rates with respect to the portfolio holdings denominated in non-U.S. currencies for the valuation price will be generally determined as of the close of business on the New York Stock Exchange, whereas for the vendor price will be generally determined as of 4 p.m. London. The calculated values may have been different if the valuation price were to have been used to calculate such values. The vendor price is as of the most recent date for which a price is available and may not necessarily be as of the date shown above.
Please see the “Determination of Net Asset Value” section of each Fund’s prospectus for additional information on the Fund’s valuation policies and procedures.
“Quantity” represents the number of shares, units or contracts of the corresponding security, as applicable per security type.
Exposure Breakdowns
| Financials | 34.06% |
| Materials | 15.63% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.66% |
| Real Estate | 9.24% |
| Industrials | 7.12% |
| Energy | 4.82% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.73% |
| Communication | 4.21% |
| Utilities | 4.02% |
| Health Care | 3.71% |
| Information Technology | 1.65% |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 0.15% |
Allocations are subject to change.
Ratings
Performance
- Jul 31, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
- Dec 31, 2025
| 1y | 3y | 5y | 10y | Incept. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Return (%) | 29.25 | 19.64 | 9.81 | 6.90 | 5.03 |
Market Price (%) | 29.01 | 19.52 | 9.76 | 6.79 | 5.02 |
Benchmark (%) | 29.87 | 20.18 | 10.07 | 7.22 | 5.33 |
After Tax Pre-Liq. (%) | 27.19 | 17.50 | 7.75 | 5.19 | 3.44 |
After Tax Post-Liq. (%) | 17.70 | 14.69 | 6.91 | 4.86 | 3.43 |
The performance quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted.
The ETF total return may appear to diverge from the return of its benchmark. This may be due to the use of systematic fair value. Click here for more information