ETF & Fonds indiciels
Pour accéder directement à un autre site BlackRock, veuillez mettre à jour votre type d'utilisateur.
Weekly video_20260427
Nicholas Fawcett
Senior Economist
BlackRock Investment Institute
Header:
CAPITAL AT RISK. MARKETING MATERIAL.
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
Camera frame
We think the Middle East conflict only piles onto inflationary pressures already bubbling under the surface. Higher yields are here to stay, in our view. That means long-term government bonds are no longer effective diversifiers against equity market declines.
Title slide: Persistent inflation constrains policy
We think the Middle East conflict only piles onto inflationary pressures already bubbling under the surface. Higher yields are here to stay, in our view. That means long-term government bonds are no longer effective diversifiers against equity market declines.
1. Too-rosy view on inflation
Prior to the Middle East conflict, markets ignored signs that inflation’s downward trend had already stalled. Core services inflation remained stubbornly high. An aging population and immigration curbs make for a tight labor market. Add the AI-led capex boom and tariff-driven goods inflation, and it was clear to us that core inflation would stay hot.
Markets have embraced this view: They are pricing out US rate cuts and expect the European Central Bank to raise interest rates this year instead of staying put.
2. A world shaped by supply
The big picture? We’re in a world shaped by supply, where supply constraints are the main drivers of inflation. So central banks face a stark trade-off between reining in inflation or supporting economic growth.
There’s more pushing up on inflation too: Governments are rushing to invest in energy security and defense. And the costs of key AI inputs like semiconductors are rising as capacity lags demand.
This is the backdrop facing the Federal Reserve and other major central banks as they meet this week.
3. Diversification mirage
All this doesn’t bode well for government bonds, which have struggled to offset equity declines throughout the Middle East conflict. This underscores what we call a 'diversification mirage' in our Global Outlook. We think it’s a core feature of the post-pandemic world.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
We prefer stocks over bonds as we see persistent inflation pressures keeping interest rates higher for longer. We also see thematic opportunities linked to AI.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
Inflation pressures predate the Middle East supply shock, leaving central banks constrained on policy. We prefer equities over government bonds.
The S&P 500 crawled to a record even as oil prices rose on more Middle East disruptions. It shows skepticism over the AI buildout’s payoff is dissipating.
We expect the Fed and other key central banks to leave policy rates unchanged this week as they face a tough trade-off between growth and inflation.
Supply disruptions emanating from the Middle East conflict have piled onto inflation pressures that were already bubbling under the surface. This week’s central bank run lays bare the bind policymakers face between reining in inflation and supporting growth and jobs. We think higher yields are here to stay – and that long-term government bonds are no longer effective diversifiers against equity declines. We stay overweight US and EM equities on the rapid AI buildout.
Annual core services inflation, 2006-26
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Eurostat, with data from Haver Analytics, April 2026. Note: The line for the US shows core services excluding shelter PCE inflation. Inset shows inflation dynamics for the latest 12 months.
Markets projected US rate cuts before the Iran war erupted – and ignored signs that inflation’s downward trend had already stalled as core services inflation remained stubbornly high. See the chart’s inset on the right. The reason: An aging population and immigration curbs make for a tight labor market. Add the AI-led capex boom and tariff-driven goods inflation, and it becomes clear why broader core inflation is running above central bank targets. Markets flipflopped when the Middle East supply disruptions caused price spikes in energy and base chemicals. They are now pricing out US rate cuts this year and expect the European Central Bank to hike instead of staying put. This shift reflects a recognition that inflation is running above pre-pandemic levels – a trend we see persisting for now.
The big picture is that we are in a world shaped by supply. The Middle East conflict has supercharged existing supply constraints and intensified mega forces – structural changes such as the energy transition, geopolitical fragmentation and AI disruption. Supply disruptions of energy, chemicals and other industrial materials are increasing inflation pressures, albeit with disparate effects across regions. Europe and parts of Asia are feeling the brunt given their dependence on imported energy. The US is more shielded as a net energy exporter. The conflict is reinforcing the resolve of governments around the world to invest in energy security and defense, adding to towering debt loads and putting upward pressure on inflation.
At the same time, an accelerating AI buildout is creating outsized demand for energy, data centers and specialised labor. This is bumping into worsening capacity and political constraints that are increasing costs. Prices of key AI inputs such as semiconductors are rising as capacity struggles to keep pace with demand. We think AI’s productivity gains could quickly offset such “chipflation” and other price pressures – and push down inflation. But this hasn’t happened yet.
Such is the backdrop for the Fed and other major central banks as they meet this week. They face a stark trade-off between trying to bring down inflation or supporting economic growth and jobs. No change in policy rates is expected, and the key is to watch for signs whether policymakers are growing concerned about persistent inflation, even if they look through price pressures caused by Middle East supply disruptions.
We stay risk-on in this environment. We are overweight US and EM equities as major AI firms are now showing they can monetize their tools. We stay underweight long-term government bonds. They struggled to offset equity declines throughout the Iran war. This underscores the “diversification mirage” outlined in the Q2 update to our 2026 Global Outlook: This is a structural feature of the post-pandemic environment as the term premium – the extra compensation investors demand for holding long-term bonds – rises on concerns over high debt loads. We prefer short-dated credit and Treasuries for quality income instead, and EM hard-currency debt as it leans toward commodity exporters benefiting from supply disruptions.
We prefer stocks over bonds as we see inflation pressures keeping interest rates higher for longer. We also eye thematic opportunities across power and infrastructure on AI demand and a scramble for energy security.
The S&P 500 notched a fresh record even as oil prices rose as shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz almost crawled to a halt. This shows the AI mega force is shaping up even stronger than we envisaged in our 2026 Global Outlook. Previous market skepticism over AI — that major players were spending heavily but not making money — is dissipating and turning into belief. AI adoption is rising and revenue growth is accelerating.
We focus on a packed week of central bank decisions. We expect the Fed, ECB, BoE and BoJ to hold rates steady – though the latter is more finely balanced. Even if the BoJ stays on hold, we expect policymakers to signal more hikes are on the table this year. We watch the ECB and BoE decisions to see if they will look through energy-driven inflation rather than respond to the risk of it spreading into wider price pressures.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of April 23, 2026. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest res at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date res. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) res are denominated in US dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE US Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, spot bitcoin, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (US, Germany and Italy), Bloomberg Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bloomberg Global Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
Bank of Japan interest rate decision
Federal Reserve interest rate decision
US PCE & GDP; ECB, BoE interest rate decision
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, April 2026
| Reasons | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tactical | ||
| Favor AI beneficiaries | We favor infrastructure and equipment supporting the AI buildout – like semiconductors, power and data center assets – that we think stand to benefit no matter the winners or losers. We see the AI theme lifting US earnings, underpinning our US equity overweight. | |
| Select international exposures | We like hard-currency EM debt on economic resilience, disciplined fiscal and monetary policy and a high ratio of commodities exporters. We like EM equities too, preferring commodity exporters and AI beneficiaries. In Europe, we favor equity sectors like infrastructure. | |
| Evolving diversifiers | We suggest looking for a “plan B” portfolio hedge as long-term US Treasuries no longer provide portfolio ballast. We like gold as a tactical play with idiosyncratic drivers, but we think it has become more unreliable as the diversification mirage grows. | |
| Strategic | ||
| Portfolio construction | We favor a scenario-based approach as AI winners and losers emerge. We lean on private markets and hedge funds for idiosyncratic return and to anchor portfolios in mega forces. | |
| Infrastructure equity and private credit | We find infrastructure equity valuations attractive and mega forces underpinning structural demand. We still like private credit but see dispersion ahead – highlighting the importance of manager selection. | |
| Beyond market cap benchmarks | We get granular in public markets. We favor DM government bonds outside the US Within equities, we favor EM over DM yet get selective in both. In EM, we like India which sits at the intersection of mega forces. In DM, we like Japan as mild inflation and corporate reforms brighten the outlook. | |
Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective, April 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, April 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developed markets | ||||||
| United States | We are overweight. Contained damage to global growth from the Mideast conflict and strong earnings expectations – particularly in tech – keep us risk-on. | |||||
| Europe | We are neutral. We are neutral. Europe’s high exposure to the energy shock from the Mideast conflict makes it vulnerable to higher inflation and lower growth. | |||||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the US, but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||||
| Japan | We are neutral. Japan’s exposure to imported energy may erode strong equity gains powered by healthy corporate balance sheets and governance reforms. | |||||
| Emerging markets (EM) | We are overweight yet stay selective. We favor Asian countries that manufacture critical AI components and Latin American energy and commodity exporters. | |||||
| China | We are neutral. Trade relations with the US have steadied, but property stress and an aging population still constrain the macro outlook. Relatively resilient activity limits near-term policy urgency. We like sectors like AI, automation and power generation. | |||||
| Fixed income | ||||||
| Short US Treasuries | We are neutral. Shorter-term bonds are relatively attractive as the market has woken up to persistent inflation and higher rates. | |||||
| Long US Treasuries | We are underweight. Yields already faced upward pressure from rising term premia, as investors demand more compensation for the risk of holding long-term debt. The recent energy price shock compounds this by aggravating pre-existing inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We think inflation will settle above pre-pandemic levels, but markets may not price this in the near term as growth cools. | |||||
| Euro area government bonds | We go neutral short-term European government bonds. The market has repriced the ECB policy path more in line with our view. We think increased German bond issuance to finance its fiscal stimulus package is already largely reflected in the current level of 10-year yields. | |||||
| UK Gilts | We are neutral. The recent budget aims to shore up market confidence through fiscal consolidation. But deferred borrowing cuts could bring back gilt market volatility. | |||||
| Japanese government bonds | We are underweight. Rate hikes, higher global term premium and heavy bond issuance will likely drive yields up further. | |||||
| China government bonds | We are neutral. China bonds offer stability and diversification but developed market yields are higher and investor sentiment shifting towards equities limits upside. | |||||
| US agency MBS | We are overweight. Agency MBS offer higher income than Treasuries with similar risk and may offer more diversification amid fiscal and inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Short-term IG credit | We are neutral. Corporate strength means spreads are low, but they could widen if issuance increases and investors rotate into US Treasuries as the Fed cuts. | |||||
| Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. We prefer short-term bonds less exposed to interest rate risk over long-term bonds. | |||||
| Global high yield | We are neutral. High yield offers more attractive carry and shorter duration, but we think dispersion between higher and weaker issuers will increase. | |||||
| Asia credit | We are neutral. Overall yields are attractive and fundamentals are solid, but spreads are tight. | |||||
| Emerging hard currency | We are overweight. EM hard-currency indexes lean towards Latin American commodity exporters such as Brazil that stand to benefit as Mideast supply plummets. | |||||
| Emerging local currency | We are neutral. The US dollar has been strengthening as a safe-haven currency in the wake of the Middle East conflict. This could reverse year-to-date gains driven by a falling USD. | |||||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, April 2026

| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equities | ||||
| Europe ex UK | We are neutral. We would need to see more business-friendly policy and deeper capital markets for recent outperformance to continue and to justify a broad overweight. We stay selective, favoring financials, utilities and healthcare. | |||
| Germany | We are neutral. Increased spending on defense and infrastructure could boost the corporate sector. But valuations rose significantly in 2025 and 2026 earnings revisions for other countries are outpacing Germany. | |||
| France | We are neutral. Political uncertainty could continue to drag corporate earnings behind peer markets. Yet some major French firms are shielded from domestic weakness, as foreign activity accounts for most of their revenues and operations. | |||
| Italy | We are neutral. Valuations are supportive relative to peers. Yet we think the growth and earnings outperformance that characterized 2022-2023 is unlikely to persist as fiscal consolidation continues and the impact of prior stimulus peters out. | |||
| Spain | We are overweight. Valuations and earnings growth are supportive relative to peers. Financials, utilities and infrastructure stocks stand to gain from a strong economic backdrop and advancements in AI. High exposure to fast-growing areas like emerging markets is also supportive. | |||
| Netherlands | We are neutral. Technology and semiconductors feature heavily in the Dutch stock market, but that’s offset by other sectors seeing less favorable valuations and a weaker earnings outlook than European peers. | |||
| Switzerland | We are neutral. Valuations have improved, but the earnings outlook is weaker than other European markets. If global risk appetite stays strong, the index’s tilt to stable, less volatile sectors may weigh on performance. | |||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the U.S., but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||
| Fixed income | ||||
| Euro area government bonds | We go neutral short-term European government bonds. The market has repriced the ECB policy path more in line with our view. We think increased German bond issuance to finance its fiscal stimulus package is already largely reflected in the current level of 10-year yields. | |||
| German bunds | We are neutral. Potential fiscal stimulus and bond issuance could push yields up, but we think market pricing reflects this possibility. Market expectations for near-term policy rates are also aligned with our view. | |||
| French OATs | We are neutral. France faces continued challenges from elevated political uncertainty, high budget deficits and slow structural reforms, but these risks already seem priced into OATs and we don’t expect a worsening from here. | |||
| Italian BTPs | We are neutral. The spread over German bunds looks tight given its large budget deficits and growing public debt. Domestic factors remain supportive, with growth holding up relative to the rest of the euro area and Italian households showing solid demand to hold BTPs at higher yields. Domestic political pushback likely prevents defense spending from rising to levels that would resurface fiscal stability concerns. | |||
| UK gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but we expect more market attention on long-term yields through the government’s November budget, given the difficulty it has had implementing spending cuts. | |||
| Swiss government bonds | We are neutral. Markets are expecting policy rates to return to negative territory, which we deem unlikely. | |||
| European inflation-protected securities | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but inflation expectations are firmly anchored. Cooling inflation and uncertain growth may matter more near term. | |||
| European investment grade | We are neutral on European investment grade credit, favoring short- to medium-term paper for quality income. We prefer European investment grade over the US Quality-adjusted spreads have tightened significantly relative to the US, but they remain wider, and we see potential for further convergence. | |||
| European high yield | We are overweight. The income potential is attractive, and we prefer European high yield for its more appealing valuations, higher quality and less sensitivity to interest rate swings compared with the US Spreads adequately compensate for the risk of a potential rise in defaults, in our view. | |||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, April 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
This material is for distribution to Professional Clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and Qualified Investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons.
Issued by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Tel: 020 7743 3000. Registered in England No. 2020394. For your protection telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is a trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy.
Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase. Fluctuation may be particularly marked in the case of a higher volatility fund and the value of an investment may fall suddenly and substantially. Levels and basis of taxation may change from time to time.
Any research in this document has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. The views expressed do not constitute investment or any other advice and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any company in the BlackRock Group or any part thereof and no assurances are made as to their accuracy.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock funds and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer.
© 2026 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, iSHARES, BUILD ON BLACKROCK and SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.