This site is designed for Professional Investors resident in South Africa. We define "Professional Investors" as those who have the appropriate expertise and knowledge e.g. asset managers, distributors and financial intermediaries. You should not use this site if you do not fall within this category.
Market take
Weekly video_20250414
Wei Li
Global Chief Investment Strategist, BlackRock
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
Camera frame
Three points on how I'm thinking about markets right now.
Title slide: Our take on the US tariff pause
1: Establishing guardrails
There's a huge amount of policy uncertainty right now. In fact, it has been impossible to predict policy. We find it more rewarding to establish guardrails, to try to understand what could potentially prompt the [US] administration to potentially change the course of policy making.
It seems to take some account of market volatility, financial risks and pushback from other sources, as well as a country's willingness to engage.
We think that can put a check on its maximal stance, and we also think that eases the risks of a near-term financial accident.
2: Three tariff types
The first type is tariffs on specific sectors to support reshoring of activities. We already had the 25% [tariff] on autos and parts and steel and aluminum. And likely coming up next are semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, copper and lumber. The second type is a bit of a universal 10% to generate revenue for the government that it really needs.
And the third type is country-specific negotiations with countries that have [a] goods surplus with the US, and [it’s] likely intended to provide leverage to try to bring down trade imbalance.
3: Extending our tactical horizon
We have been saying that in the near term, because of policy uncertainty, risk assets are likely going to come under pressure and over the longer term, fundamentals should prevail. And [we] were more positive over the six-to-12-month horizon. After April 2, huge amount of policy uncertainty aside, what really worried us was that there didn't seem to be checks on the maximal policy making stance from the US administration, which made us think that we couldn't really see that much further ahead.
And we shortened the technical investment horizon from 6 to 12 months to three months, putting more emphasis on the near-term hunkering down. And at the time we said that we didn't know how long or how short this period would be. Then fast forward to last week, where my biggest takeaway is that there were tracks, after all, on the maximal policy making stance from the US administration.
And yes, of course, looking ahead, there is going to be so much uncertainty, volatility, policy headlines flying around. But the fact that the checks exist gave us confidence to resume the 6–12-month horizon of tactical investing, where we are more positive.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
Currently we’re modestly positive on US equities, especially after the year-to-date drawdown.
And we're modestly positive on Japanese equities on a currency unhedged basis. We are selectively in favor of sectoral opportunities like banks in Europe. We are underweight in [long-term] US treasuries. They are supposed to behave like safe haven assets, and they really haven't been in this new regime of high debt and inflationary pressure. And in fact, gold has been a better diversifier in this new environment for portfolios.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
The consideration of some financial risks and costs of tariffs has put a check on the US approach. We extend our tactical horizon to dial up risk-taking.
Global markets endured extraordinary volatility last week. A spike in long-term US Treasury yields was one factor seeming to drive a change in tactics.
We expect the European Central Bank to cut interest rates this week. US tariffs will likely lower growth in Europe, but greater fiscal spending may limit the drag.
The 90-day pause of tariffs on most countries and exemption of key tech imports suggest the US administration is taking some account of financial risks and costs as well as a country’s willingness to engage. It shows there are factors that could put a check on the administration’s maximal tariff stance. As a result, late last week we extended our tactical horizon back to six to 12 months to dial up risk. Yet we still think tariffs can hurt growth and lift inflation, and major uncertainty remains.
Ten largest bilateral US trade deficits, 2024
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute and US Census Bureau, with data from Haver Analytics, April 2025. Note: The chart shows the ten largest trade deficits – the difference between US goods imports and exports with a country – in 2024. The trade deficit for the European Union (EU) is the sum of the trade deficits across all EU members.
The US has paused country-specific “reciprocal” tariffs on all nations, except China, for 90 days and exempted some key tech imports. These tariffs are intended to create negotiating leverage on countries with which the US runs goods trade deficits – and reduce imbalances. See the chart. Even with the pause, the US average effective tariff rate is still around 20%, including 145% tariffs on select Chinese imports. We see US tariffs adding to inflation. Prolonged uncertainty raises the risk of recession. It may drag on corporate investment and delay longer-term commitments. Consumer spending could be hurt by any erosion of wealth and real incomes. Dented confidence in the US could curb foreign investor appetite for US assets. Trade tensions with China are set to deepen. We see tariffs lowering growth in China, and potential policy stimulus only partly offsetting that drag.
Along with country-specific tariffs, we see two other primary types of US tariffs. First, tariffs on strategic sectors to support reshoring of activity. Second, a universal 10% tariff on most imports to generate revenue and aid domestic production. Even with last week’s pause – and subsequent exemption of some key tech imports such as smartphones – the US is still facing much higher tariffs than we expected a few weeks ago. With uncertainty around where tariffs will land and unpredictable negotiations ahead, we aim to understand the factors that can prompt the administration to change course on policy. It appears to be taking some account of market volatility, financial risks and other sources of pushback, as well as a country’s willingness to engage. That is putting a check on its maximal stance and could bind policy changes.
The implications? The near-term risk of a financial accident has eased. We cautiously leaned back into risk late last week by extending our tactical horizon back to six to 12 months from three months. We also renewed our overweight to US and Japanese stocks. US equities are supported by the AI theme, resilient corporate earnings and a so far solid economy. We see Japanese stocks still benefiting from stronger corporate profits and shareholder-friendly reforms. We recently upped Europe’s stocks to neutral but focus on selective opportunities while looking for more progress on structural challenges.
Yet we expect ongoing risk asset volatility and potentially sharp reversals. Spiking yields in long-term US Treasuries seemed to be a factor in the change in tariff tactics. We stay underweight long-term Treasuries, our highest conviction view: tariffs are likely to add to already sticky inflation, and congressional budget plans last week reinforce the outlook for persistent budget deficits. We favor gold instead as a portfolio diversifier. The broad-based equity selloff has created opportunities to tap into certain sectors, and selectivity is key. We still like US technology benefitting from the AI buildout and adoption. We also favor global banks. That includes US banks given the scope for deregulation even with some potential economic pain. We also like banks in Europe (higher rates versus pre-pandemic levels) and Japan (stronger loan growth).
The US paused most “reciprocal” tariffs even as US-China trade tensions look set to deepen. Checks on policy allowed us to extend our tactical horizon back to six to 12 months and resume our positive view on US and Japanese stocks.
Markets have endured extraordinary volatility due to uncertainty over US tariffs. The S&P 500 rebounded nearly 6% last week, with one of its largest daily jumps in its history after the pause on “reciprocal” tariffs. But the index remains 13% below its February record high. The US dollar tumbled to three-year lows against major currencies even as both 10- and 30-year US Treasury yields spiked about 50 basis points to 4.50% and 4.90% – on track for their largest weekly rise in four decades.
We expect the European Central Bank (ECB) to cut interest rates at its policy meeting this week. What seemed to be a toss up between a cut and a hold before the announcement of additional US tariffs on April 2 will most likely be a cut, as sweeping tariffs risk pushing the bloc towards recession. We expect tariffs to lower growth in Europe, yet greater fiscal spending could limit the drag from tariffs.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of April 10, 2025. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest returns at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date returns. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) returns are denominated in US dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE US Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (US, Germany and Italy), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Broad Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
UK unemployment
UK CPI
ECB policy decision
Japan CPI
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, April 2025
Reasons | ||
---|---|---|
Tactical | ||
US equities | Policy uncertainty may weigh on growth and stocks in the near term. Yet we think US equities can regain their global leadership. We think the underlying economy and corporate earnings are still solid and supported by mega forces such as AI. | |
Japanese equities | We are overweight. Ongoing shareholder-friendly corporate reforms remain a positive. We prefer unhedged exposures given the yen’s potential strength during bouts of market stress. | |
Selective in fixed income | Persistent deficits and sticky inflation in the US make us underweight long-term US Treasuries. We also prefer European credit – both investment grade and high yield – over the US on more attractive spreads. | |
Strategic | ||
Infrastructure equity and private credit | We see opportunities in infrastructure equity due to attractive relative valuations and mega forces. We think private credit will earn lending share as banks retreat – and at attractive returns. | |
Fixed income granularity | We prefer DM government bonds over investment grade credit given tight spreads. Within DM government bonds, we favor short- and medium-term maturities in the US, and UK gilts across maturities. | |
Equity granularity | We favor emerging over developed markets yet get selective in both. EMs at the cross current of mega forces – like India and Saudi Arabia – offer opportunities. In DM, we like Japan as the return of inflation and corporate reforms brighten the outlook. |
Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective, April 2025. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, April 2025
We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equities | ||||||
United States | We are overweight. Policy uncertainty may weigh on growth and stocks in the near term. Yet we think the underlying economy and corporate earnings are still solid and supported by mega forces such as AI. | |||||
Europe | We are neutral, preferring the US and Japan. We see room for more European Central Bank rate cuts, supporting an earnings recovery. Rising defense spending, as well as potential fiscal loosening and de-escalation in the Ukraine war are other positives. | |||||
UK | We are neutral. Political stability could improve investor sentiment. Yet an increase in the corporate tax burden could hurt profit margins near term. | |||||
Japan | We are overweight given the return of inflation and shareholder-friendly corporate reforms. We prefer unhedged exposure as the yen has tended to strengthen during bouts of market stress. | |||||
Emerging markets | We are neutral. The growth and earnings outlook is mixed. | |||||
China | We are neutral. The uncertainty of tariffs and trade barriers makes us more cautious. Structural challenges to China’s growth and tariff risks also weigh on our outlook. | |||||
Fixed income | ||||||
Short US Treasuries | We are overweight. We view short-term Treasuries as akin to cash in our tactical views. We also like medium-maturities to lean against the market pricing of multiple Fed rate cuts this year. | |||||
Long US Treasuries | We are underweight. Persistent budget deficits and geopolitical fragmentation could drive term premium up over the near term. We prefer intermediate maturities less vulnerable to investors demanding more term premium. | |||||
Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but cooling inflation and growth may matter more near term. | |||||
Euro area government bonds | We are underweight. We see room for yields to climb more as Europe moves to ramp up defense and infrastructure spending. The European Central Bank is also nearing the end of rate cuts. | |||||
UK Gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but the risk of higher US yields having a knock-on impact and reducing the UK’s fiscal space has risen. We are monitoring the UK fiscal situation. | |||||
Japan government bonds | We are underweight. Yields have surged, yet stock returns still look more attractive to us. | |||||
China government bonds | We are neutral. Bonds are supported by looser policy. Yet we find yields more attractive in short-term DM paper. | |||||
US agency MBS | We are neutral. We see agency MBS as a high-quality exposure in a diversified bond allocation and prefer it to IG. | |||||
Short-term IG credit | We are overweight. Short-term bonds better compensate for interest rate risk. | |||||
Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. Spreads are tight, so we prefer taking risk in equities from a whole portfolio perspective. We prefer Europe over the US. | |||||
Global high yield | We are neutral. Spreads are tight, but the total income makes it more attractive than IG. We prefer Europe. | |||||
Asia credit | We are neutral. We don’t find valuations compelling enough to turn more positive. | |||||
Emerging market - hard currency | We are neutral. The asset class has performed well due to its quality, attractive yields and EM central bank rate cuts. We think those rate cuts may soon be paused. | |||||
Emerging market - local currency | We are underweight. We see emerging market currencies as especially sensitive to trade uncertainty and global risk sentiment. |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, April 2025
Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Equities | ||||
Europe ex UK | We are neutral, preferring the US and Japan. We see room for more European Central Bank rate cuts, supporting an earnings recovery. Rising defense spending, as well as potential fiscal loosening and de-escalation in the Ukraine war are other positives. | |||
Germany | We are underweight. Valuations and earnings momentum offer modest support compared to peers, especially as ECB rate cuts ease financing conditions. Prolonged uncertainty over the next government, potential tariffs, and fading optimism about China’s stimulus could dampen sentiment. | |||
France | We are underweight. The outcome of France’s parliamentary election and ongoing political uncertainty could weigh on business conditions for French companies. Yet, only a small share of the revenues and operations of major French firms is tied to domestic activity. | |||
Italy | We are underweight. Valuations are supportive relative to peers, but past growth and earnings outperformance largely stemmed from significant fiscal stimulus in 2022-2023, which is unlikely to be sustained in the coming years. | |||
Spain | We are neutral. Valuations and earnings momentum are supportive compared to other euro area stocks. The utilities sector stands to gain from an improving economic backdrop and advancements in AI. | |||
Netherlands | We are underweight. The Dutch stock market’s tilt to technology and semiconductors—key beneficiaries of rising AI demand—is offset by less favorable valuations and a weaker earnings outlook compared to European peers. | |||
Switzerland | We are underweight, consistent with our broader European view. Earnings have improved, but valuations remain elevated compared to other European markets. The index’s defensive tilt may offer less support if global risk appetite stays strong. | |||
UK | We are neutral. Political stability could improve investor sentiment. Yet an increase in the corporate tax burden could hurt profit margins near term. | |||
Fixed income | ||||
Euro area government bonds | We are underweight. We see room for yields to climb more as Europe moves to ramp up defense and infrastructure spending. The European Central Bank is also nearing the end of rate cuts. | |||
German bunds | We are neutral. Market pricing aligns with our policy rate expectations, and 10-year yields have eased from their highs, partly due to growth concerns. We are watching the fiscal flexibility debate ahead of upcoming elections. | |||
French OATs | We are neutral. France faces challenges from elevated political uncertainty, persistent budget deficits, and a slower pace of structural reforms. The EU has already warned the country for breaching fiscal rules, and its sovereign credit rating was downgraded earlier this year. | |||
Italian BTPs | We are neutral. The spread over German bunds looks tight given its budget deficits and debt profile, prompting a warning from the EU. Other domestic factors remain supportive, with growth holding up relative to the rest of the euro area and Italian households showing solid demand to hold BTPs at higher yields. | |||
UK gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but the risk of higher US yields having a knock-on impact and reducing the UK’s fiscal space has risen. We are monitoring the UK fiscal situation. | |||
Swiss government bonds | We are neutral. The Swiss National Bank has cut policy rates this year as inflationary pressures eased but is unlikely to reduce rates significantly further. | |||
European inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but cooling inflation and sluggish growth may matter more near term. | |||
European investment grade credit | We are neutral on European investment grade credit, favoring short- to medium-term paper for quality income. We prefer European investment grade over the US, as spreads are relatively wider. | |||
European high yield | We are overweight. The income potential is attractive, and we prefer European high yield for its more appealing valuations, higher quality, and shorter duration compared to the US. In our view, spreads adequately compensate for the risk of a potential rise in defaults. |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, April 2025. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
This material is for distribution to Professional Clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and Qualified Investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons.
Issued by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Tel: 020 7743 3000. Registered in England No. 2020394. For your protection telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is a trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy.
Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase. Fluctuation may be particularly marked in the case of a higher volatility fund and the value of an investment may fall suddenly and substantially. Levels and basis of taxation may change from time to time.
Any research in this document has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. The views expressed do not constitute investment or any other advice and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any company in the BlackRock Group or any part thereof and no assurances are made as to their accuracy.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock funds and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer.
© 2025 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, iSHARES, BUILD ON BLACKROCK and SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.