This site is designed for Professional Investors resident in South Africa. We define "Professional Investors" as those who have the appropriate expertise and knowledge e.g. asset managers, distributors and financial intermediaries. You should not use this site if you do not fall within this category.
Market take
Weekly video_20250519
Vivek Paul
Global Head of Portfolio Research, BlackRock Investment Institute
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
Camera frame
Moody’s US debt downgrade has reignited concerns — but we still see US assets as central to global portfolios.
Title slide: US risk assets still core to portfolios
1: US asset performance
US equities have surged 22% from their April lows, according to LSEG. Tech stocks have led the gains, affirming our preference for the AI theme.
When equities slid, so did the US dollar and Treasuries - triggering speculation that investors are losing faith in US assets. It’s not that simple.
The dollar is still historically strong. And we have long argued that investors would demand more compensation for holding long-term US bonds – because of persistently large fiscal deficits, sticky inflation and bond volatility. Plus, long-term Treasuries still carry a relatively low risk premium versus the past.
The tariff-driven inflation and quarterly contractions we expect this year are akin to past periods when the dollar fell and term premium rose, and investors didn’t question US assets more broadly then.
We stay overweight US stocks on a six-to-12-month horizon, thanks to US corporate strength and mega forces – big structural shifts like AI – that are driving an economic transformation on par with the industrial revolution.
2: Why long-term investing is harder now
We are publishing multiple sets of long-run capital market assumptions for the first time to reflect a wider range of potential outcomes and be more dynamic in building portfolios. We build our strategic allocations around a starting point scenario. But we now formally track alternative paths — so we’re ready to pivot portfolios should those scenarios unfold.
3. Our latest strategic views
We believe the starting point has to reflect today’s reality of global capital markets – with US assets core to portfolios. Why? Hard economic rules limit how quickly the current structure can change. Supply chains can’t be rewired overnight — as the recent 90-day pause on US-China tariffs shows. And the US still depends on stable foreign funding to sustain its debt. Moody’s downgrade highlights the risk that persistent deficits and higher interest costs could dent confidence among foreign bondholders, pushing yields even higher. That’s why our starting point also includes our expectation of rising term premium for US Treasuries and persistent inflation.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
Economic transformation makes building long-term portfolio construction more challenging. We now use a starting point scenario in our strategic views and formally track others. US assets are still core to portfolios, in our view.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
Moody’s US debt downgrade highlights key challenges. We weigh long-term scenarios but still see US assets playing a core role in global portfolios.
US stocks rose 2% last week after a tech driven rally, with the S&P 500 up 22% from its April lows. US 10-year Treasury yields ticked up on the week.
This week we watch global flash PMIs for early signs of the business sentiment impact of US-China trade de-escalation. Yet the data will likely remain volatile.
US stocks have soared after sliding with US bonds and the dollar last month. That joint drop stoked talk of US assets losing their long-term appeal. Moody’s US rating cut reinforces our long-held view that investors would want to see a rise in today’s relatively low compensation for the risk of holding long-term US bonds. We still see US assets as core to portfolios. The uncertain outlook means we cannot have conviction in one central scenario alone in our strategic views.
US 10-year term premium and the broad US dollar, 1970-2000
The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, Federal Reserve Board, NY Fed, with data from Bloomberg, May 2025. Note: The lines show the US 10-year term premium and the real trade-weighted US dollar index.
US stocks have jumped 22% from their April lows, according to LSEG data, after the US policy-driven selloff. Tech stocks have led the gains, reinforcing our preference for the artificial intelligence (AI) theme. Yet when equities slid, so did the US dollar and Treasuries – spurring talk of investors losing confidence in US assets. We don’t think that’s the case. The dollar is still historically strong. And we have long argued that investors would want more term premium, or compensation, for holding long-term US bonds given persistently large fiscal deficits, sticky inflation and bond volatility. And long-term Treasuries still carry a relatively low risk premium versus the past. The tariff-driven inflation and quarterly contractions we expect this year are akin to past periods when the dollar fell and term premium rose, and investors didn’t question US assets then. See the chart.
We stay overweight US stocks on a six- to 12-month tactical horizon thanks to US corporate strength and mega forces – big structural shifts like AI that are driving an economic transformation on a par with the industrial revolution. The end state of that transformation is unknowable, making longer-term asset allocation extremely challenging. We can no longer anchor views around a single base case and, as we’ve long argued, static allocations don’t work in the post-pandemic world. That is why we’re developing multiple sets of long-run capital market assumptions for the first time. We build our strategic allocations around a starting point scenario but now formally track others so we know how we would pivot portfolios should they come to fruition. This will allow us to move quickly as we learn more about how the transformation is evolving.
What is our starting point scenario for our strategic views? We believe it has to be the current structure of the global capital market – with US assets still core to portfolios. That’s because hard economic rules limit how quickly the structure can change. The recent 90-day pause on many US-China tariffs illustrates one such rule: Supply chains can’t be rewired quickly without disruption. Moody’s decision to downgrade the US government’s top-notch credit rating last week shines a light on a second rule: keeping US debt sustainable relies on large and steady funding by foreign investors. The downgrade reinforces the US fiscal sustainability challenge that we've long flagged, especially persistent US budget deficits at a time when higher interest rates are boosting debt servicing costs. If these dynamics dent the confidence of foreign bond holders, rising term premium could push up bond yields and debt servicing costs even more.
That’s why our starting point also includes our expectation of rising term premium for US Treasuries and persistent inflation pressure. We go overweight inflation-linked bonds and neutral global investment grade credit given wider spreads. We lean into private markets and like infrastructure equity, such as stakes in airports and data centers, as it benefits from mega forces. Private markets are complex and not suitable for all investors. We keep this scenario under review as we learn more.
Economic transformation makes long-term portfolio construction more challenging. We now use a starting point scenario in our strategic views and formally track others. US assets are still core to portfolios, in our view.
The S&P 500 rose 2% last week in a tech-led recovery after policy-driven pullbacks in April. That put the index 22% above its April lows. US 10-year Treasury yields ticked up to 4.45%, up more than 50 basis points since early April. Market are pricing in two rate cuts by the Federal Reserve for the rest of the year. US CPI data for April showed easing wage pressures and don’t yet reflect the tariff impact. Yet we think the tight labor market will keep inflation sticky, limiting how much the Fed can cut.
This week, we’re watching global flash PMIs for May for any signs of improvement following the 90-day pause on US-China tariffs. Trade and inflation data from Japan and the UK should shed light on how the US tariff shock is rippling out to the rest of the world.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of May 15, 2025. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest returns at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date returns. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) returns are denominated in US dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE US Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (US, Germany and Italy), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Broad Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
UK CPI; Japan trade balance
Global flash PMIs
Japan CPI
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Markets have come around to the view that central banks will not quickly ease policy in a world shaped by supply constraints. We see them keeping policy tight to lean against inflationary pressures.
Higher macro and market volatility has brought more divergent security performance relative to the broader market. Benefiting from this requires granularity and nimbleness.
The new regime is shaped by five structural forces we think are poised to create big shifts in profitability across economies and sectors. The key is identifying catalysts that can supercharge them and whether the shifts are priced by markets today.
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, May 2025
Reasons | ||
---|---|---|
Tactical | ||
US equities | Policy uncertainty and supply disruptions are weighing on near-term growth, raising the risk of a contraction. Yet we think US equities will regain global leadership as the AI theme keeps providing near-term earnings support and could drive productivity in the long term. | |
Japanese equities | We are overweight. Ongoing shareholder-friendly corporate reforms remain a positive. We prefer unhedged exposures given the yen’s potential strength during bouts of market stress. | |
Selective in fixed income | Persistent deficits and sticky inflation in the US make us underweight long-term US Treasuries. We also prefer European credit – both investment grade and high yield – over the US on more attractive spreads. | |
Strategic | ||
Infrastructure equity and private credit | We see opportunities in infrastructure equity due to attractive relative valuations and mega forces. We think private credit will earn lending share as banks retreat – and at attractive returns. | |
Fixed income granularity | We prefer short-term inflation-linked bonds over nominal developed market (DM) government bonds, as US tariffs could push up inflation. Within DM government bonds, we favor UK gilts over other regions. | |
Equity granularity | We favor emerging over developed markets yet get selective in both. Emerging markets (EM) at the cross current of mega forces – like India – offer opportunities. In DM, we like Japan as the return of inflation and corporate reforms brighten the outlook. |
Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective, May 2025. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, May 2025
We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equities | ||||||
United States | We are overweight. Policy-driven volatility and supply-side constraints are pressuring growth, but we see AI supporting corporate earnings in the near term and driving productivity over the long run. | |||||
Europe | We are neutral, preferring the US and Japan. We see structural growth concerns and uncertainty over the impacts of rising defense spending, fiscal loosening and de-escalation in Ukraine. Yet room for more European Central Bank rate cuts can support an earnings recovery. | |||||
UK | We are neutral. Political stability could improve investor sentiment. Yet an increase in the corporate tax burden could hurt profit margins near term. | |||||
Japan | We are overweight given the return of inflation and shareholder-friendly corporate reforms. We prefer unhedged exposure as the yen has tended to strengthen during bouts of market stress. | |||||
Emerging markets | We are neutral. US tariffs and trade tensions are likely to drag on growth in China and emerging markets more broadly, even with potential policy support. | |||||
China | We are neutral. The uncertainty of trade barriers makes us more cautious, with potential policy stimulus only partly offsetting the drag. We still see structural challenges to China’s growth. | |||||
Fixed income | ||||||
Short US Treasuries | We are overweight. We view short-term Treasuries as akin to cash in our tactical views – but we would still lean against the market pricing of multiple Fed rate cuts this year. | |||||
Long US Treasuries | We are underweight. Persistent budget deficits and geopolitical fragmentation could drive term premium up over the near term. We prefer intermediate maturities less vulnerable to investors demanding more term premium. | |||||
Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but cooling inflation and growth may matter more near term. | |||||
Euro area government bonds | We are underweight. Growth and inflation risks are balanced. Trade uncertainty may hurt growth more than it boosts inflation, allowing the ECB to cut rates more. Greater defense and infrastructure spending will support growth in the medium term but might boost term premia. | |||||
UK Gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but the risk of higher US yields having a knock-on impact and reducing the UK’s fiscal space has risen. We are monitoring the UK fiscal situation. | |||||
Japan government bonds | We are underweight. Yields have surged, yet stock returns still look more attractive to us. | |||||
China government bonds | We are neutral. Bonds are supported by looser policy. Yet we find yields more attractive in short-term DM paper. | |||||
US agency MBS | We are neutral. We see agency MBS as a high-quality exposure in a diversified bond allocation and prefer it to IG. | |||||
Short-term IG credit | We are overweight. Short-term bonds better compensate for interest rate risk. | |||||
Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. Spreads are tight, so we prefer taking risk in equities from a whole portfolio perspective. We prefer Europe over the US. | |||||
Global high yield | We are neutral. Spreads are tight, but the total income makes it more attractive than IG. We prefer Europe. | |||||
Asia credit | We are neutral. We don’t find valuations compelling enough to turn more positive. | |||||
Emerging market - hard currency | We are neutral. The asset class has performed well due to its quality, attractive yields and EM central bank rate cuts. We think those rate cuts may soon be paused. | |||||
Emerging market - local currency | We are underweight. We see emerging market currencies as especially sensitive to trade uncertainty and global risk sentiment. |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
This material is for distribution to Professional Clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and Qualified Investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons.
Issued by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Tel: 020 7743 3000. Registered in England No. 2020394. For your protection telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is a trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy.
Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase. Fluctuation may be particularly marked in the case of a higher volatility fund and the value of an investment may fall suddenly and substantially. Levels and basis of taxation may change from time to time.
Any research in this document has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. The views expressed do not constitute investment or any other advice and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any company in the BlackRock Group or any part thereof and no assurances are made as to their accuracy.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock funds and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer.
© 2025 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, iSHARES, BUILD ON BLACKROCK and SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.