To reach a different BlackRock site directly, please update your user type.
Market take
Weekly video_20250505
Nicholas Fawcett
Senior Economist, BlackRock Investment Institute
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
The trade conflict, especially between the US and China, is causing major disruptions.
If tariffs between the two countries stay where they are, we expect a supply-driven contraction in US activity this year.
Yet, if economic rules keep spurring policy changes, the drag could be lower.
Title slide: Tracking the trade conflict disruption
1: Echoes of the Covid-19 shock
The uncertainty around US tariffs is evolving into difficulties akin to what US companies faced during the Covid-19 shock, when they struggled to get key inputs for goods.
2: The path of economic activity
The hit to economic activity ultimately depends on where tariffs land. If economic rules keep binding, damage could be limited. We have seen several tariff exemptions made already – including with China.
3: What we’re tracking
What’s important is the impact on the long-term growth trend for the US
As the impact of trade disruptions ripples through the economy, we are tracking a range of indicators to gauge what the damage could be and how long it’ll last.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
We expect tariffs maintained at current levels to cause a supply-driven contraction in activity this year and eye a range of indicators for pressure. Yet economic rules binding policy could limit the impact, keeping us overweight US stocks.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
BIIM0525U/M-4465228
We expect a US contraction this year given supply disruptions from tariffs. We stay overweight US stocks as the artificial intelligence theme rolls on.
Above-consensus US payrolls data helped boost risk assets last week, with US stocks climbing 3%. US 10-year Treasury yields ended the week steady.
The Federal Reserve confronts sharpening policy tradeoff it between weaker activity and sticky inflation at its meeting this week as seen in the Q1 GDP data.
The trade conflict between the US and China is causing major economic disruptions. If tariffs stay at current levels, we expect a supply-driven contraction in US activity this year. Yet this is very different from a typical business cycle recession given Covid-like supply constraints. Hard economic rules binding on policy may limit the damage. The AI mega force keeps us overweight US stocks and positive on developed market stocks, even with more volatility likely.
Contribution to annualized US GDP growth, 2020-2025
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, with data from Haver Analytics, April 2025. Note: The chart shows the contribution to of various economic activities to quarterly US GDP growth, shown on an annualized basis. The grey bars include consumer & government spending, and non-residential & residential investment.
US tariffs and uncertainty initially sparked concerns about waning confidence and declining demand. That’s now evolving into supply-driven disruptions, akin to the difficulties US companies faced getting inputs for goods during the Covid-19 shock. Case in point: Companies rushed to import goods during Q1 to get ahead of tariffs, leading to a record surge in imports. See the orange bar in the chart. Along with a surge in inventories, we expect more volatility in activity data that don’t yet reflect the ensuing disruptions since the April 2 tariff announcement, especially the maximal US stance on China. If current steep tariffs stay in place between the US and China, we see a supply-driven economic contraction tied to trade-related disruptions like the Covid-19 shock. This contraction is not a typical business cycle recession – and one we can look through on a tactical horizon.
We expect a contraction marked by production shutdowns, bottlenecks and shortages like during the pandemic – though spending on services won’t be as directly affected. Activity may also restart quickly as it did during the pandemic. These supply-driven elements could bolster the inflationary pressure from tariffs, building on already high inflation. That presents the Fed with a sharper trade-off between protecting growth by coming to the rescue with rate cuts and reining in inflation. We track a range of indicators – like port traffic, capital spending plans and high-frequency financial and consumer spending data – to monitor how the supply-driven shock ripples out. This reinforces the hard economic rule that supply chain dependencies can’t be rewired quickly without disruption. If these rules constrain negotiations, damage could be limited.
Some sectors are more exposed to tariffs than others – with sectoral differences already at play in Q1 earnings reports. The companies at the forefront of the AI mega force have largely kept driving US equity strength, while policy uncertainty weighs more heavily on the rest of the market. Some big tech companies have beat Q1 earnings expectations, noted surging AI-driven demand and announced plans to increase AI-related investment. That underscores how the AI mega force persists, even with major supply-driven disruptions – keeping us positive on developed market (DM) stocks, especially the US On the flip side, automakers are among the most exposed to key supply inputs from China, with some flagging the impact of tariffs in their full-year earnings guidance. The longer policy uncertainty lasts, the deeper the damage could be.
We have evolved our views as markets have adjusted to uncertainty. Just two days after April 2, we reduced risk by cutting our tactical horizon to three months. Yet the 90-day tariff pause showed economic rules can spur changes in policy. That led us to return our tactical horizon to six to 12 months to dial up exposure to developed market stocks. On a longer-term horizon, key questions remain about the best way to tap into an economic transformation, if investor bias for domestic assets will prevail, the outlook for the US dollar’s haven status, and investing in private markets amid structurally higher interest rates.
We expect tariffs at current levels to spur a supply-driven contraction this year, while supply disruptions boost inflation. The AI theme keeps us positive on DM stocks, especially the US, though more volatility is likely ahead.
The above-consensus US payrolls data helped boost risk assets and offset a drop in some tech shares on concerns about the tariff impact. The S&P 500 climbed 3% last week, closing the gap with where it was before April but still down 8% from the February all-time highs. US 10-year Treasury yields ended the week at 4.31%, up about 40 basis points from their April lows. Markets have priced out some Federal Reserve rate cuts and now see a first quarter-point cut coming as soon as July.
The Federal Reserve takes center stage this week. Last week’s US Q1 GDP report showed major disruptions to activity even before the April 2 tariff announcement, sharpening the tradeoff the Fed faces between lower growth and higher inflation. Even with the contraction of activity we expect, we don’t see the Fed cutting rates as much as the market is pricing in. US and China trade data for March will reflect some of the frontloading of US imports before the tariffs.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of May 2, 2025. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest returns at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date returns. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) returns are denominated in US dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE US Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (US, Germany and Italy), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Broad Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
US trade data
Federal Reserve policy decision
Bank of England policy decision
China trade data
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, May 2025
Reasons | ||
---|---|---|
Tactical | ||
US equities | Policy uncertainty and supply disruptions are weighing on near-term growth, raising the risk of a contraction. Yet we think US equities will regain global leadership as the AI theme keeps providing near-term earnings support and could drive productivity in the long term. | |
Japanese equities | We are overweight. Ongoing shareholder-friendly corporate reforms remain a positive. We prefer unhedged exposures given the yen’s potential strength during bouts of market stress. | |
Selective in fixed income | Persistent deficits and sticky inflation in the US make us underweight long-term US Treasuries. We also prefer European credit – both investment grade and high yield – over the US on more attractive spreads. | |
Strategic | ||
Infrastructure equity and private credit | We see opportunities in infrastructure equity due to attractive relative valuations and mega forces. We think private credit will earn lending share as banks retreat – and at attractive returns. | |
Fixed income granularity | We prefer DM government bonds over investment grade credit given tight spreads. Within DM government bonds, we favor short- and medium-term maturities in the US, and UK gilts across maturities. | |
Equity granularity | We favor emerging over developed markets yet get selective in both. EMs at the cross current of mega forces – like India and Saudi Arabia – offer opportunities. In DM, we like Japan as the return of inflation and corporate reforms brighten the outlook. |
Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective, May 2025. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, May 2025
We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equities | ||||||
United States | We are overweight. Policy-driven volatility and supply-side constraints are pressuring growth, but we see AI supporting corporate earnings in the near term and driving productivity over the long run. | |||||
Europe | We are neutral, preferring the US and Japan. We see room for more European Central Bank rate cuts, supporting an earnings recovery. Rising defense spending, as well as potential fiscal loosening and de-escalation in the Ukraine war are other positives. | |||||
UK | We are neutral. Political stability could improve investor sentiment. Yet an increase in the corporate tax burden could hurt profit margins near term. | |||||
Japan | We are overweight given the return of inflation and shareholder-friendly corporate reforms. We prefer unhedged exposure as the yen has tended to strengthen during bouts of market stress. | |||||
Emerging markets | We are neutral. US tariffs and trade tensions are likely to drag on growth in China and emerging markets more broadly, even with potential policy support. | |||||
China | We are neutral. The uncertainty of trade barriers makes us more cautious, with potential policy stimulus only partly offsetting the drag. We still see structural challenges to China’s growth. | |||||
Fixed income | ||||||
Short US Treasuries | We are overweight. We view short-term Treasuries as akin to cash in our tactical views – but we would still lean against the market pricing of multiple Fed rate cuts this year. | |||||
Long US Treasuries | We are underweight. Persistent budget deficits and geopolitical fragmentation could drive term premium up over the near term. We prefer intermediate maturities less vulnerable to investors demanding more term premium. | |||||
Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but cooling inflation and growth may matter more near term. | |||||
Euro area government bonds | We are underweight. We see room for yields to climb more as Europe moves to ramp up defense and infrastructure spending. The European Central Bank is also nearing the end of rate cuts. | |||||
UK Gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but the risk of higher US yields having a knock-on impact and reducing the UK’s fiscal space has risen. We are monitoring the UK fiscal situation. | |||||
Japan government bonds | We are underweight. Yields have surged, yet stock returns still look more attractive to us. | |||||
China government bonds | We are neutral. Bonds are supported by looser policy. Yet we find yields more attractive in short-term DM paper. | |||||
US agency MBS | We are neutral. We see agency MBS as a high-quality exposure in a diversified bond allocation and prefer it to IG. | |||||
Short-term IG credit | We are overweight. Short-term bonds better compensate for interest rate risk. | |||||
Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. Spreads are tight, so we prefer taking risk in equities from a whole portfolio perspective. We prefer Europe over the US. | |||||
Global high yield | We are neutral. Spreads are tight, but the total income makes it more attractive than IG. We prefer Europe. | |||||
Asia credit | We are neutral. We don’t find valuations compelling enough to turn more positive. | |||||
Emerging market - hard currency | We are neutral. The asset class has performed well due to its quality, attractive yields and EM central bank rate cuts. We think those rate cuts may soon be paused. | |||||
Emerging market - local currency | We are underweight. We see emerging market currencies as especially sensitive to trade uncertainty and global risk sentiment. |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, May 2025
Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Equities | ||||
Europe ex UK | We are neutral, preferring the US and Japan. We see room for more European Central Bank rate cuts, supporting an earnings recovery. Rising defense spending, as well as potential fiscal loosening and de-escalation in the Ukraine war are other positives. | |||
Germany | We are underweight. Valuations and earnings momentum offer modest support compared to peers, especially as ECB rate cuts ease financing conditions. Prolonged uncertainty over the next government, potential tariffs, and fading optimism about China’s stimulus could dampen sentiment. | |||
France | We are underweight. The outcome of France’s parliamentary election and ongoing political uncertainty could weigh on business conditions for French companies. Yet, only a small share of the revenues and operations of major French firms is tied to domestic activity. | |||
Italy | We are underweight. Valuations are supportive relative to peers, but past growth and earnings outperformance largely stemmed from significant fiscal stimulus in 2022-2023, which is unlikely to be sustained in the coming years. | |||
Spain | We are neutral. Valuations and earnings momentum are supportive compared to other euro area stocks. The utilities sector stands to gain from an improving economic backdrop and advancements in AI. | |||
Netherlands | We are underweight. The Dutch stock market’s tilt to technology and semiconductors—key beneficiaries of rising AI demand—is offset by less favorable valuations and a weaker earnings outlook compared to European peers. | |||
Switzerland | We are underweight, consistent with our broader European view. Earnings have improved, but valuations remain elevated compared to other European markets. The index’s defensive tilt may offer less support if global risk appetite stays strong. | |||
UK | We are neutral. Political stability could improve investor sentiment. Yet an increase in the corporate tax burden could hurt profit margins near term. | |||
Fixed income | ||||
Euro area government bonds | We are underweight. We see room for yields to climb more as Europe moves to ramp up defense and infrastructure spending. The European Central Bank is also nearing the end of rate cuts. | |||
German bunds | We are neutral. Market pricing aligns with our policy rate expectations, and 10-year yields have eased from their highs, partly due to growth concerns. We are watching the fiscal flexibility debate ahead of upcoming elections. | |||
French OATs | We are neutral. France faces challenges from elevated political uncertainty, persistent budget deficits, and a slower pace of structural reforms. The EU has already warned the country for breaching fiscal rules, and its sovereign credit rating was downgraded earlier this year. | |||
Italian BTPs | We are neutral. The spread over German bunds looks tight given its budget deficits and debt profile, prompting a warning from the EU. Other domestic factors remain supportive, with growth holding up relative to the rest of the euro area and Italian households showing solid demand to hold BTPs at higher yields. | |||
UK gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but the risk of higher US yields having a knock-on impact and reducing the UK’s fiscal space has risen. We are monitoring the UK fiscal situation. | |||
Swiss government bonds | We are neutral. The Swiss National Bank has cut policy rates this year as inflationary pressures eased but is unlikely to reduce rates significantly further. | |||
European inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but cooling inflation and sluggish growth may matter more near term. | |||
European investment grade credit | We are neutral on European investment grade credit, favoring short- to medium-term paper for quality income. We prefer European investment grade over the US, as spreads are relatively wider. | |||
European high yield | We are overweight. The income potential is attractive, and we prefer European high yield for its more appealing valuations, higher quality, and shorter duration compared to the US. In our view, spreads adequately compensate for the risk of a potential rise in defaults. |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, May 2025. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
This material is for distribution to Professional Clients (as defined by the FCA Rules) and should not be relied upon by any other persons.
Issued by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Tel: 020 7743 3000. Registered in England No. 2020394. For your protection telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is a trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
Sources: Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase. Fluctuation may be particularly marked in the case of a higher volatility fund and the value of an investment may fall suddenly and substantially. Levels and basis of taxation may change from time to time.
Any research in this document has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. The views expressed do not constitute investment or any other advice and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any company in the BlackRock Group or any part thereof and no assurances are made as to their accuracy.
The opinions expressed in this paper may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this paper are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents.
This paper may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this paper is at the sole discretion of the reader.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock funds and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer.
© 2025 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, iSHARES, BUILD ON BLACKROCK and SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.