The need for a new portfolio approach
Market take
Weekly video_20260608
Devan Nathwani
Portfolio Strategist
BlackRock Investment Institute
Header:
CAPITAL AT RISK. MARKETING MATERIAL.
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
Camera frame
Title slide: The need for a new portfolio approach
Today’s world is shaped by supply. That means the availability of workers, energy and other key materials for economic activity shape the outlook more than demand for those factors. And mega forces like AI and geopolitical fragmentation are transforming markets and economies with multiple plausible scenarios playing out.
This environment tests how long-term portfolios have traditionally been built and creating the need for a different approach.
1: Can’t avoid making big calls
Markets are increasingly being driven by a few mega forces that are cutting across asset class labels. The result is asset class labels can mask the underlying economic drivers of return and risk. This means asset allocation decisions in this environment are big active calls.
This all explains the rising interest in what’s been called a total portfolio approach, or TPA for short. Investors are increasingly thinking in terms of exposures and themes — not just broad asset classes.
2: What is TPA?
TPA is inconsistently defined across the industry. But it reflects an approach to building portfolios that allocates capital and risk across the whole portfolio to meet client-specific objectives. This approach defines exposures through underlying economic and factor drivers, looking at public and private markets together. All investments are assessed by their contribution to total portfolio risk and return.
3: A more dynamic framework
A scenario-based approach can help investors adapt faster to changing conditions. But it needs a clear framework.
That includes internally consistent risk and return assumptions across public and private assets, a plan for blending alpha, factor and index returns, and systematic ways to deal with economic uncertainty.
This is especially important when mega forces are driving returns and making almost every portfolio decision an active call.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
All asset allocation decisions are active calls in today’s investment environment. We think portfolios need to be built around exposures and convictions, with asset classes used as implementation tools — not the organizing framework.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
A fast-changing investment landscape driven by mega forces necessitates a new portfolio approach built around exposures – not asset class labels.
The S&P 500 fell 2% and the Nasdaq slid nearly 5%. U.S. 10-year Treasury yields rose to 4.54%, back to one-year highs hit last month.
We look to U.S. May inflation data to gauge how the ongoing Mideast supply shock is impacting already sticky price pressures.
We’ve long argued this is a world where mega forces like AI transforming markets could imply different long-term outcomes. Why? Macro anchors investors have relied upon – like stable inflation expectations – are lost, meaning structural calls need more frequent updating. Growing interest in total portfolio approaches (TPA) reflects a desire for a new portfolio construction framework. This fits with our evolving whole portfolio research and implementation of the past decade.
Looking through labels
IT sector share of selected equity and bond indexes, 2022 and 2026
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from Bloomberg and Dealogic (ION Analytics), June 2026. The bars show the information technology sector's share of the MSCI U.S. and MSCI Emerging Markets equity indexes, and in U.S. investment grade bond issuance.
The recent attention on TPA reflects growing appetite among institutional investors to fundamentally rethink strategic horizon portfolio construction. Yet beyond this, there is no broadly accepted agreement on what TPA details. While its meaning varies among different practitioners, TPA points to common aspects of how traditional strategic asset allocation (SAA) should evolve, like setting client-specific objectives in the context of the whole portfolio. We’re seeing this play out now as mega forces shape markets, highlighting how taking thematic exposures in portfolios requires a lens that transcends asset classes: The share of the information technology sector in the MSCI U.S. and MSCI emerging market (EM) indexes has roughly doubled since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022 – and more than doubled in investment grade bond issuance since then.
Rising interest in TPA can also be viewed as a symptom of this new investment environment. Simply put – solving for a static SAA over many years is inconsistent with today’s world – and investor experience of this in their portfolios leads directly to the desire to search for a new approach to portfolio construction. Our strategic-horizon portfolio construction work, developed over the past decade, is designed to address many of these objectives while adding the detail, definition and governance needed for implementation. See here how we define our portfolio construction framework.
A more active approach
Zooming out, we think this means investors should revisit big portfolio calls more often and have an explicit plan B portfolio ready. It also calls for a common whole portfolio lens that shifts the unit of analysis to the underlying economic and factor drivers of return and risk, plus a more holistic approach to risk budgeting between alpha and beta. This approach was a touchpoint at our Midyear Forum last week. Some of our credit investors mentioned how they focus on underlying exposures as opposed to asset class labels, while fixed income macro investors unpacked how our micro is macro theme from our 2026 Global Outlook is informing decisions. Elsewhere, equity investors noted that geography is no longer a major input for investment decisions: What matters more is what a company actually does and the drivers of its revenue, not the country where its stock happens to be listed.
The key: portfolio decisions shouldn’t be driven by asset class labels. Adopting a scenario-based approach should be done carefully and with a clear framework as to how governance needs to evolve with it, as investors often cite an improved governance process as one potential benefit but can struggle to implement it in practice. This includes internally consistent risk and return assumptions across private and public assets; a plan for blending alpha, factor and index returns; a scenario approach; and systematic ways of dealing with economic uncertainty. These frameworks maximize flexibility while allowing fund governance to hold decision-making to account. Clear decision-making processes are also essential to make trade-offs comparable across the whole portfolio. What’s key: the portfolio construction process, not the labels given to it.
Our bottom line
All asset allocation decisions are active calls in today’s investment environment. This requires portfolios to be built around exposures and convictions – and looking beyond asset class labels.
Market backdrop
The S&P 500 fell more than 2% but was roughly 3% off its all-time high last week following a sharp selloff in key chip stocks. The tech-heavy Nasdaq slid nearly 5%. U.S. 10-year Treasury yields climbed to 4.54%, back near one-year highs, following the May jobs report. We’re closely watching how new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh will address this mix of strong jobs growth, an uptick in job vacancies and mounting wage pressure at his first policy meeting as chair next week.
We look to May U.S. inflation figures for a clearer read on how the Mideast conflict energy shock is impacting already sticky inflation. The full breadth of the shock has yet to show and will depend on how it evolves. Even so, we think a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz into July could bring the impact of the shock to the fore more prominently, especially as U.S. oil inventories potentially hit four-decade lows.
Week ahead
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of June 4, 2026. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest res at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date res. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) res are denominated in U.S. dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, spot bitcoin, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (U.S., Germany and Italy), Bloomberg Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bloomberg Global Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
U.S. trade; China trade
U.S. CPI; China CPI and PPI
U.S. PPI
UK GDP
Read our past weekly market commentaries here.
Big calls
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, June 2026
| Reasons | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tactical | ||
| Favor AI beneficiaries | We favor infrastructure and equipment supporting the AI buildout such as semiconductors, power and data centers. We think they stand to benefit no matter AI’s eventual winners or losers. We see the AI boom lifting U.S. corporate earnings. underpinning our U.S. equity overweight. | |
| Selected international exposures | We like hard-currency EM debt on economic resilience, disciplined fiscal and monetary policy and a high ratio of commodities exporters. We’re also overweight EM equities, preferring commodity exporters and AI beneficiaries. In Europe, we favor equity sectors like infrastructure. | |
| Evolving diversifiers | We suggest looking for “plan B” portfolio hedges such as thematic opportunities related to the AI built-out and search for energy security. Long-term U.S. Treasuries no longer provide a buffer against equity market declines, and gold also has shown to be an ineffective diversifier. | |
| Strategic | ||
| Portfolio construction | We favor a scenario-based approach as AI winners and losers emerge. We lean on private markets and hedge funds for idiosyncratic returns and to anchor portfolios in mega forces. | |
| Infrastructure equity and private credit | We find infrastructure equity valuations attractive as geopolitical fragmentation and the AI build-out underpin structural demand. We still like private credit but see an increase in dispersion of returns. This highlights the importance of manager selection. | |
| Beyond market cap benchmarks | We get granular in public markets. We favor DM government bonds outside the U.S. Within equities, we favor EM over DM – and get selective in both. In EM, we like India because it sits at the intersection of mega forces. In DM, we like Japan amid inflation and corporate reforms. | |
Note: Views are from a U.S. dollar perspective, June 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Tactical granular views table
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, June 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Granular views
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, June 2026
| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equities | ||||||
| United States | We are overweight. Contained damage to global growth from the Mideast conflict and strong earnings expectations – particularly in tech – keep us risk-on. | |||||
| Europe | We are neutral. Europe’s high exposure to the energy shock from the Mideast conflict makes it vulnerable to higher inflation and lower growth. | |||||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the U.S., but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||||
| Japan | We are neutral. Japan’s exposure to imported energy may erode strong equity gains powered by healthy corporate balance sheets and governance reforms. | |||||
| Emerging markets (EM) | We are overweight yet stay selective. We favor Asian countries that manufacture critical AI components and Latin American energy and commodity exporters. | |||||
| China | We are neutral. Trade relations with the U.S. have steadied, but property stress and an aging population still constrain the macro outlook. Relatively resilient activity limits near-term policy urgency. We like sectors like AI, automation and power generation. | |||||
| Fixed income | ||||||
| Short U.S. Treasuries | We are neutral. Shorter-term bonds are relatively attractive as the market has woken up to persistent inflation and higher rates. | |||||
| Long U.S. Treasuries | We are underweight. Yields already faced upward pressure from rising term premia, as investors demand more compensation for the risk of holding long-term debt. The recent energy price shock compounds this by aggravating pre-existing inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. We think inflation will settle above pre-pandemic levels, but markets may not price this in the near term as growth cools. | |||||
| Euro area government bonds | We are neutral short-term European government bonds. The market has repriced the ECB policy path more in line with our view. We think increased German bond issuance to finance its fiscal stimulus package is already largely reflected in the current level of 10-year yields. | |||||
| UK gilts | We are neutral. We expect volatility in gilts over the near-term. Gas powers much of the UK’s electricity, but storage is limited – making it especially vulnerable to a resurgence in inflation. | |||||
| Japanese government bonds | We are underweight. Rate hikes, higher global term premium and heavy bond issuance will likely drive yields up further. | |||||
| China government bonds | We are neutral. China bonds offer stability and diversification but developed market yields are higher and investor sentiment shifting towards equities limits upside. | |||||
| U.S. agency MBS | We are overweight. Agency MBS offer higher income than Treasuries with similar risk, and may offer more diversification amid fiscal and inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Short-term IG credit | We are neutral. Corporate strength means spreads are low, but they could widen if issuance increases. | |||||
| Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. We prefer short-term bonds less exposed to interest rate risk over long-term bonds. | |||||
| Global high yield | We are neutral. High yield offers more attractive carry and shorter duration, but we think dispersion between higher and weaker issuers will increase. | |||||
| Asia credit | We are neutral. Overall yields are attractive and fundamentals are solid, but spreads are tight. | |||||
| Emerging hard currency | We are overweight. EM hard-currency indexes lean towards Latin American commodity exporters such as Brazil that stand to benefit as Mideast supply plummets. | |||||
| Emerging local currency | We are neutral. The U.S. dollar has been strengthening as a safe-haven currency in the wake of the Middle East conflict. This could reverse year-to-date gains driven by a falling USD. | |||||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a U.S. dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Euro-denominated tactical granular views
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, June 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equities | ||||
| Europe ex UK | We are neutral. We would need to see more business-friendly policy and deeper capital markets for recent outperformance to continue and to justify a broad overweight. We stay selective, favoring financials, utilities and healthcare. | |||
| Germany | We are neutral. Increased spending on defense and infrastructure could boost the corporate sector. But valuations rose significantly in 2025 and 2026 earnings revisions for other countries are outpacing Germany. | |||
| France | We are neutral. Political uncertainty could continue to drag corporate earnings behind peer markets. Yet some major French firms are shielded from domestic weakness, as foreign activity accounts for most of their revenues and operations. | |||
| Italy | We are neutral. Valuations are supportive relative to peers. Yet we think the growth and earnings outperformance that characterized 2022-2023 is unlikely to persist as fiscal consolidation continues and the impact of prior stimulus peters out. | |||
| Spain | We are overweight. Valuations and earnings growth are supportive relative to peers. Financials, utilities and infrastructure stocks stand to gain from a strong economic backdrop and advancements in AI. High exposure to fast-growing areas like emerging markets is also supportive. | |||
| Netherlands | We are neutral. Technology and semiconductors feature heavily in the Dutch stock market, but that’s offset by other sectors seeing less favorable valuations and a weaker earnings outlook than European peers. | |||
| Switzerland | We are neutral. Valuations have improved, but the earnings outlook is weaker than other European markets. If global risk appetite stays strong, the index’s tilt to stable, less volatile sectors may weigh on performance. | |||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the U.S., but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||
| Fixed income | ||||
| Euro area government bonds | We are neutral short-term European government bonds. The market has repriced the ECB policy path more in line with our view. We think increased German bond issuance to finance its fiscal stimulus package is already largely reflected in the current level of 10-year yields. | |||
| German bunds | We are neutral. Markets have largely priced in fiscal stimulus and bond issuance, and expectations for policy rates align with our view. | |||
| French OATs | We are neutral. Political uncertainty, high budget deficits and slow structural reforms could stoke volatility, but current spreads incorporate these risks and we don’t expect a worsening from here. | |||
| Italian BTPs | We are neutral. Demand from Italian households is strong at current yield levels. Spreads tightened in line with its sovereign credit upgrade, but a persistently high debt-to-GDP levels means they likely won’t tighten further. | |||
| UK gilts | We are neutral. We expect volatility in gilts over the near-term. Gas powers much of the UK’s electricity, but storage is limited – making it especially vulnerable to a resurgence in inflation. | |||
| Swiss government bonds | We are neutral. We don’t think the Swiss National Bank will slash policy rates to below zero, as markets expect. | |||
| European inflation-protected securities | We are neutral. Our medium-term inflation expectations align with those implied in current market pricing. | |||
| European investment grade | We are neutral. We favor short- to medium-term debt and Europe over the U.S. An intense re-leveraging cycle to support the AI buildout could put upward pressure on U.S. spreads, making Europe relatively more attractive. | |||
| European high yield | We are overweight. Spreads hover near historic lows, but credit losses have been limited in this cycle and better economic growth in 2026 could reduce them further. | |||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, June 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
On the go?




