Search Form

Chip Castille and Warren Cormier on the 2013 BlackRock Retirement Survey

What drives a successful defined contribution plan? What do participants think about their retirement plans – and the employers who offer them? And do DC plans represent an untapped opportunity to build employee loyalty and alignment? Those are some of the issues that this year's BlackRock Retirement Survey was designed to explore.

Research is part of the culture at BlackRock, according to Chip Castille, head of BlackRock's US & Canada DC group. The point of research, he states, is not simply to understand the evolution of retirement, but to "help shape the evolution and respond to trends in simple, clear, actionable ways." It's a process that begins with listening to participants and plan sponsors.

That's why every year, BlackRock commissions the Boston Research Group to conduct the Retirement Survey and work with the BlackRock team to analyze the findings. This year's survey included over one thousand active participants and 102 plan sponsors. (The plan sponsors were selected from some of the largest institutional plans in the country, with an average asset size of $1.2 billion.)

"Sometimes the surveys validate our basic assumptions," says Castille, "But at other times, the results force us to rethink our premises and find new ways of solving problems." This year's survey led to key insights into how broadly participants connect their employers' DC plan to the broader corporate culture, how increased clarity about retirement drives increased savings, and how participants feel about automatic features and management.

Chip Castille and Boston Research Group's Warren Cormier discussed these and other insights with DCfocus:

Key Survey Insights - and What to Do About Them!

Key Insight 1 - DC's Untapped Potential for Improving Workplace Culture
Research to develop BlackRock's® Retirement Engagement Benchmark™ found a connection between the quality of a plan and greater employee loyalty and productivity. The survey results suggests that simply doing a better job "marketing" the plan to employees and explicitly positioning it as a manifestation of the company's values and culture improves loyalty and better engages participants in saving for retirement.

Key Insight 2 - Clarity About Retirement Drives Increased Savings
As the saying goes, it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness. Fortunately, there are several "candles" plan sponsors can light for participants. One designed for participants between the ages of 55 and 64 is BlackRock's CoRI™ tool powered by BlackRock's CoRI Retirement Index. Participants can input their age and their savings balance and obtain an estimate of how much annual retirement income their savings translates into. Conversely, they can use the tool to estimate how much savings they would need to generate a specific annual income level in retirement.

Key Insight 3 - Participants Like Auto Features
Many plan sponsors understand that specific actions, ranging from auto enrollment and auto escalation to full reenrollment into a target date fund, will help participants create better retirements. The survey results should increase plan sponsor confidence about "doing the right thing" for participants. The results strongly suggest that reinforcing the DC plan as part of the firm's comprehensive retirement and financial wellness initiative can increase participation, deferral rates and retirement preparation.

Let's talk about how participants view their plans and the idea that plan sponsors may not recognize their plan's "untapped potential."

Castille: We found that DC plans not only have a major impact on participant savings, but they also shape the way participants feel about their employer's missions, values, and workplace culture. That was somewhat unexpected. Participants connect their view of the plan to that of the larger workplace and they even view it as an expression of the corporate values. That suggests DC plans have an untapped potential for not only influencing savings behavior, but also creating a more positive workplace culture.

Cormier: Employers tend to view their DC plan as a cost of doing business in the labor market. When we talk to them about how perceptions of the plan affect the broader corporate culture, they ask why that would be.

We know that culturally, the more an employer expresses care for their employees, the more trust and commonality there is between employers and employees. When we talk to participants we find that 79% claimed that they see their DC plan as a valuable benefit that has made them more loyal to their employer. 80% say that the more their employer improves the plan, the more they believe that the company cares about them as individuals. We believe, the DC plan is a manifestation of the corporate culture and a potential unforeseen opportunity for employers.

There is a lot of talk in the DC industry about how to get participants more engaged in their retirement. What we've found is that if participants perceive the quality of the plan, it snowballs. As they get more engaged with their retirement and more aligned with their employer, we see more loyalty and productivity.

Castille: Employees tend to see every benefit offered to them as part of a complete benefits package. And they perceive that benefit package to be a statement of the company's mission and values. The research suggests that simply doing a better job marketing your plan to employees and positioning it explicitly as a manifestation of the company's values and culture can improve loyalty and better engage participants in saving for retirement. And that's a finding we found to be very interesting.

Let's turn to the idea about how clarity about retirement drives action.

Cormier: We wanted to understand how well participants understand what they need in order to retire. The hypothesis was the greater the clarity, the greater the stimulus to action. We started by asking plan sponsors how they thought their participants were doing at estimating what they need for retirement. 97% said that the majority of their participants incorrectly estimate how much they will need to live comfortably in retirement.

Then we asked participants what would happen if someone told them how much income their current savings would fund in retirement, 94% said it would increase their savings rate. Then we asked what if someone told you how much you would need to reach your retirement income goal. 95% said it would have an impact on their savings rate. When we tied these questions to their actual savings rate and doing our analysis, we saw that clarity doesn't just correlate to higher savings rates, it actually causes higher savings.

Castille: I think the key takeaway is that if we can create some clarity about life after retirement and then connect that back to actions participants can take in their DC plan, we can offer a new way to plan for retirement. In fact, in July we introduced the BlackRock CoRI™ Retirement Indexes and the online CoRI tool that do exactly this. It's designed for people from age 55 to 64 to help them estimate the lifetime retirement income potential of their savings, or, if they have a retirement income goal, understand how much savings they would need to achieve their goal.

Individuals have been responding to the tool very positively. Just anecdotally, a colleague called me up the other day to say that his mother had been playing with the tool and really liked it. The point is that these don't have to be complicated retirement planning exercises. If you can create enthusiasm and curiosity, you can engage people in their retirement. And, as Warren points out, if you can create clarity at the same time, you can help drive better actions.

The survey shows that participants like automatic features and management. Tell us about that.

Castille: 91% of participants like auto-enrollment and 77% like auto-escalation. We also find that significant majorities like the automated management features found in target date funds and would respond favorably to being automatically reenrolled into a target date fund. These are consistent with what we have found in previous surveys.

But I think what's exciting about this survey is that we can come back to our other key insights. We understand that participants perceive these tools as demonstrations of the mission and values of the company. An interesting example of this is that participants tend to see the company match as guidance on how much savings to defer. This should give confidence to plan sponsors about using all the tools in their plan design toolkit with the understanding that participants will perceive it in a positive way.

That raises a question. Many plan design features depend on inertia, on participants not opting out. Is this in contradiction with the idea of engaging participants in their retirement? Engagement sounds like the opposite of inertia.

Castille: That's an important distinction. When we talk about engagement, we mean with the benefit itself, helping them see that this is a positive for them and tying it back to the employer. We count on inertia with respect to investment decisions that many participants don't want to make themselves. We rely on inertia to do the good things underneath to get them to good investment outcomes, while working on getting engagement with the plan itself and communicating the ability of the plan itself to help in an effort to deliver something you will want in the future.

Historically, we have focused on education, which I think has been well intentioned but misguided. First of all, it's hard to educate people on things like compound arithmetic, portfolio diversification and expected returns. We also find that people are receptive to education only at certain inflection points in their lives. Warren, I'll toss that over to you to unpack.

Cormier: The goal of education has been too aggressive in terms of teaching people about complicated investment concepts. We have found that if you simply educate them that they've got a plan, that it has value, and tell them the simple things they need to do to take advantage of it, they would become more engaged.

Education programs are designed on the premise that all participants are ready to learn everything there is to know about their plan. And that's not true. What we have found is that there is readiness to learn things at inflection points in their lives. For example, if someone is getting married, that's when he or she is ready to learn about those aspects of the plan, the features and benefits related to being married.

Castille: That is part of the significance of the CoRI online tool. It's for people in pre-retirement who want to estimate how much they will need to save for their retirement. It is an example of providing education and engagement for participants who are ready for it.

Given some of the negative perceptions of DC in the popular press, what do you think is the state of DC based on the survey research?

I think the DC system has been an amazing success. In 30 years it has grown to be among the largest retirement systems in the world. I think some of the negativity is that some people at 60 or 55 realizing that their DC plan was going to be more important to their retirement than they thought it would be 20 years ago. And that is something we as a society need to look at. But if you're 30 years old today, given what we know about auto features and default investments I think you have every reason to expect a successful retirement.

(DCfocus would like to thank Alison C. Mintzer of PLANSPONOSR Magazine for her contribution to this article.)

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.

The CoRI Funds do not ensure that an investor will have sufficient assets to cover retirement expenses or that an investor will have enough saved to be able to retire in the year identified in the CoRI Fund name. The CoRI Funds, the CoRI Retirement Indexes, their returns, and the value of an investment in the CoRI Funds, do not reflect the fees, expenses and cost that may be associated with an annuity or any other retirement income product that an individual may purchase, or any assumption that such a product will be available for purchase at the time of retirement. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy based on a CoRI Retirement Index will be successful. The CoRI Retirement Indexes are unmanaged and an investor cannot invest directly in a CoRI Retirement Index.

The CoRI Funds may engage in active and frequent trading and may experience high portfolio turnover, which may result in increased transaction costs to the funds. The two main risks related to fixed income investing are interest rate risk and credit risk. Typically, when interest rates rise, there is a corresponding decline in bond values. The CoRI Funds may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates due to the current period of historically low rates. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the bond issuer will not be able to make principal and interest payments. The CoRI Funds may use derivatives to hedge investments or to seek to enhance returns. Derivatives entail risks relating to liquidity, leverage and credit that may reduce returns and increase volatility.

In Canada, this material is intended for accredited investors only. This material is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or offering of shares or units of any fund or other security in any jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offering is unlawful or to any person to whom it is unlawful.

In Latin America, for Institutional and Professional Investors Only. This material is solely for educational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares of any fund (nor shall any such shares be offered or sold to any person) in any jurisdiction within Latin America in which an offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities law of that jurisdiction. If any funds are mentioned or inferred to in this material, it is possible that some or all of the funds have not been registered with the securities regulator of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay or any other securities regulator in any Latin American country, and thus, might not be publicly offered within any such country. The securities regulators of such countries have not confirmed the accuracy of any information contained herein. No information discussed herein can be provided to the general public in Latin America.

Material prepared by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., located at 400 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA.

BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.

DC-0817 / 02-14