Rethinking long-term investing
A new approach to portfolio constructionStatic strategic asset allocation no longer suffices in a world shaped by mega forces. It’s crucial to revisit key calls and focus on underlying economic drivers.
Market backdropInvestors went risk-off on AI fears in February. The S&P 500 notched its worst month in nearly a year and yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries fell below 4%.
Week aheadWe’re watching labor data this week. We expect U.S. February payrolls data to show a resilient labor market, reaffirming the Fed’s new hawkish tone.
Renewed conflict in the Middle East, the software selloff and Nvidia’s earnings show mega forces reshaping markets in real time. These mega forces are well known, yet the scale and even direction of their long-run impact is uncertain. With no one long-term scenario, it’s crucial to assess calls more often and focus on fundamental economic drivers over asset class labels. On a strategic horizon of five years or longer, we go overweight high yield credit and like infrastructure.
Leaning on scenariosIllustrative distribution of U.S. equity returns
For illustrative purposes only. Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, March 2026. Note: The illustration shows a hypothetical distribution of U.S. equity returns in the different scenarios underlying our capital market assumptions. Read more here; for professional investors only.
The cross-currents of mega forces are shaping markets – now and long term. Geopolitical fragmentation is front and center as conflict escalates in the Middle East. The AI buildout keeps rolling on, as seen in Nvidia’s earnings, and the selloff in software marks a new focus on perceived AI losers. At the same time, fiscal and inflation anchors have weakened. The long-run economy could arrive at structurally different regimes, each with very different return expectations. That makes any set of long-run capital market assumptions conditional: it reflects one assumed path for the economy. This led us to begin tracking multiple scenarios last year. See the chart. Our starting point assumes sticky inflation limits interest rate cuts. AI-related gains could spark a breakout from 2% trend growth. This could also fail to occur, and further geopolitical fragmentation could push up risk premium for U.S. assets.
We have evolved our capital market assumptions (CMAs – for professional investors only) and portfolio construction approach to address this bifurcation. Many of these changes align with the broader industry shift towards total portfolio approach (TPA), though TPA itself is loosely defined and can mean many different things in practice. First, we revisit major portfolio judgements more often and set an explicit Plan B grounded in scenarios, with clarity on the portfolio changes those scenarios require. We review our CMAs quarterly and began incorporating explicit alternate scenarios as of Q2 last year.
Focusing on fundamental economic drivers
Second, we focus on fundamental economic drivers rather than asset class labels. Why? Broad asset class benchmarks are a blunt instrument for expressing views in an era of transformation. Mega forces do not show up uniformly across markets: their effects land in specific sectors, parts of the yield curve and balance sheet structures. Portfolio construction needs more granularity to reflect this. So, we shift the unit of analysis. Instead, we measure exposures at the whole portfolio level based on economic and factor drivers of return and risk. This is key for private assets, where benchmarks are less standardized.
Third, we budget portfolio risk holistically. Economic transformation raises dispersion within asset classes. That strengthens the case for treating alpha as an allocation decision, not an add-on. This includes setting clear rules for sizing alpha versus beta risk, and defining where private markets and hedge funds can fit into the risk budget.
We update our strategic views of five years or longer in our starting point scenario. We think the AI buildout will boost inflation and widen credit spreads. Inflation-linked bonds can offset the former. And high yield bonds – less sensitive to interest rate shifts – can offset the latter, so we go overweight. We see fiscal pressures pushing up yields on developed market bonds, so we go neutral. We’re also neutral developed market equities but stay overweight emerging market stocks. We get selective in private credit as dispersion grows. And we like infrastructure given it benefits from multiple mega forces.
Our bottom line
Static, set-it-and-forget-it strategic asset allocation (SAA) doesn’t work in a world where mega forces make long-term outcomes uncertain. Our SAA approach revisits key decisions, focuses on underlying drivers and sets a risk budget.
Market backdrop
The S&P 500 saw its biggest monthly drop since March 2025. Nvidia’s earnings beat failed to soothe mounting market anxiety about AI disruption and higher-than-expected wholesale inflation data reinforced concerns about sticky inflation. U.S. 10-year Treasury yields fell below 4.00% as fretful investors retreated to defensive assets. Brent crude oil gained nearly 4% last week on concerns about further conflict in the Middle East before the weekend developments.
We’re watching labor market data and flash PMIs around the world. We expect February U.S. payrolls to show ongoing labor market resilience – keeping the Federal Reserve on hold in coming months. The market is still pricing in two quarter-point rate cuts by year end. In the euro area, the February flash inflation data are likely to reinforce expectations that the European Central Bank is also on hold.
Week ahead
March 2Global flash PMIs
March 3Euro area flash inflation; Japan unemployment
March 4Euro area unemployment
March 6U.S. payrolls; euro area revised
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Big calls
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, March 2026
Note: Views are from a U.S. dollar perspective, March 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Tactical granular views
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, March 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a U.S. dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Euro-denominated tactical granular views
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, March 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, March 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.



