INSIGHTS & VIEWS
INVESTMENT INSIGHTS
Our thought leadership in investing, risk management, portfolio construction and trading solutions.
Please read this page before proceeding as it explains certain restrictions imposed by law on the distribution of this information and the jurisdictions in which our products and services are authorised to be offered or sold.
By entering this site, you are agreeing that you have reviewed and agreed to the terms contained herein, including any legal or regulatory restrictions, and have consented to the collection, use and disclosure of your personal data as set out in the Privacy section referred to below.
By confirming below, you also acknowledge that you:
(i) have read this important information;
(ii) agree your access to this website is subject to the disclaimer, risk warnings and other information set out herein; and
(iii) are the relevant sophistication level and/or type of audience intended for your respective country or jurisdiction identified below.
The information contained on this website (this “Website”) (including without limitation the information, functions and documents posted herein (together, the “Contents”) is made available for informational purposes only.
No Offer
The Contents have been prepared without regard to the investment objectives, financial situation, or means of any person or entity, and the Website is not soliciting any action based upon them.
This material should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities and does not constitute an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where or to any persons to whom it would be unauthorized or unlawful to do so.
Access Subject to Local Restrictions
The Website is intended for the following audiences in each respective country or region: In the U.S.: public distribution. In Canada: public distribution. In the UK and outside the EEA: professional clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and qualified investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons. In the EEA, professional clients, qualified clients, and qualified investors. For qualified investors in Switzerland, qualified investors as defined in the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006, as amended. In DIFC: 'Professional Clients’ and no other person should rely upon the information contained within it. In Singapore, public distribution. In Hong Kong, public distribution. In South Korea, Qualified Professional Investors (as defined in the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act and its sub-regulations). In Taiwan, Professional Investors. In Japan, Professional Investors only (Professional Investor is defined in Financial Instruments and Exchange Act). In Australia, public distribution. In China, this may not be distributed to individuals resident in the People's Republic of China ("PRC", for such purposes, excluding Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) or entities registered in the PRC unless such parties have received all the required PRC government approvals to participate in any investment or receive any investment advisory or investment management services. For Other APAC Countries, Institutional Investors only (or professional/sophisticated /qualified investors, as such term may apply in local jurisdictions). In Latin America, institutional investors and financial intermediaries only (not for public distribution).
This Contents are not intended for, or directed to, persons in any countries or jurisdictions that are not enumerated above, or to an audience other than as specified above.
This Website has not been, and will not be submitted to become, approved/verified by, or registered with, any relevant government authorities under the local laws. This Website is not intended for and should not be accessed by persons located or resident in any jurisdiction where (by reason of that person's nationality, domicile, residence or otherwise) the publication or availability of this Website is prohibited or contrary to local law or regulation or would subject any BlackRock entity to any registration or licensing requirements in such jurisdiction.
It is your responsibility to be aware of, to obtain all relevant regulatory approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations under, and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction in connection with your access. If you are unsure about the meaning of any of the information provided, please consult your financial or other professional adviser.
No Warranty
The Contents are published in good faith but no advice, representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by BlackRock or by any person as to its adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or that it is fit for your particular purpose, and it should not be relied on as such. The Contents do not purport to be complete and is subject to change. You acknowledge that certain information contained in this Website supplied by third parties may be incorrect or incomplete, and such information is provided on an "AS IS" basis. We reserve the right to change, modify, add, or delete, any content and the terms of use of this Website without notice. Users are advised to periodically review the contents of this Website to be familiar with any modifications. The Website has not made, and expressly disclaims, any representations with respect to any forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future.
No information on this Website constitutes business, financial, investment, trading, tax, legal, regulatory, accounting or any other advice. If you are unsure about the meaning of any information provided, please consult your financial or other professional adviser.
No Liability
BlackRock shall have no liability for any loss or damage arising in connection with this Website or out of the use, inability to use or reliance on the Contents by any person, including without limitation, any loss of profit or any other damage, direct or consequential, regardless of whether they arise from contractual or tort (including negligence) or whether BlackRock has foreseen such possibility, except where such exclusion or limitation contravenes the applicable law.
You may leave this Website when you access certain links on this Website. BlackRock has not examined any of these websites and does not assume any responsibility for the contents of such websites nor the services, products or items offered through such websites.
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright, trademark and other forms of proprietary rights protect the Contents of this Website. All Contents are owned or controlled by BlackRock or the party credited as the provider of the Content. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Website should be considered as granting any licence or right under any copyright, patent or trademark or other intellectual property rights of BlackRock or any third party.
This Website is for your personal use. As a user, you must not sell, copy, publish, distribute, transfer, modify, display, reproduce, and/or create any derivative works from the information or software on this Website. You must not redeliver any of the pages, text, images, or content of this Website using "framing" or similar technology. Systematic retrieval of content from this Website to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory (whether through robots, spiders, automatic devices or manual processes) or creating links to this Website is strictly prohibited. You acknowledge that you have no right to use the content of this Website in any other manner.
Additional Information
Investment involves risks. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase.
Privacy
Your name, email address and other personal details will be processed in accordance with BlackRock’s Privacy Policy for your specific country which you may read by accessing our website at https://www.blackrock.com.
Please note that you are required to read and accept the terms of our Privacy Policy before you are able to access our websites.
Once you have confirmed that you agree to the legal information herein, and the Privacy Policy – by indicating your consent – we will place a cookie on your computer to recognise you and prevent this page from reappearing should you access this site, or other BlackRock sites, on future occasions. The cookie will expire after six months, or sooner should there be a material change to this important information.
The global BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) aims to capture overall market attention to geopolitical risks, as the line chart shows. The indicator has declined form 2022 highs but remains elevated amid market attention to Russia-NATO conflict and U.S.-China strategic competition.
We recently improved our data cleaning process, including removing disclosure and mistranslated language. We have adjusted the historical data accordingly, resulting in the removal of some spikes in geopolitical risk that were overstated.
We raise our U.S.-China strategic competition risk rating to a high level amid heightened distrust in the relationship. Structural tensions between the two nations present significant risks for investors, in our view. We also increase the likelihood of Gulf tensions to high. Tensions over Iran's nuclear program and support for Russia are building, raising the risk of military confrontation in the Middle East to its highest level in nearly a decade.
Risk | Description | Market attention since 2019 | Likelihood | Our view |
---|---|---|---|---|
Russia-NATO conflict | Russia launches a large-scale invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. and EU respond with financial, energy and technology sanctions on Russia. | High | Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the largest, most dangerous military conflict in Europe since WWII. Russian President Vladimir Putin failed in his initial aim to destroy Ukrainian sovereignty. Ukraine has recaptured significant territory in the south and northeast, though battlefield progress has slowed and Russia appears to be preparing an offensive. Russia has increased attacks on Ukraine’s energy and civilian infrastructure. A settlement or even a ceasefire looks unlikely for now. Instead, we see an extended conflict, alongside a long-term political, economic and military standoff between the West and Russia. Intentional or accidental escalation between NATO and Russia remains a risk. | |
U.S.-China strategic competition | China takes military action against Taiwan or asserts claims in the South China Sea by force. | High | The U.S. downing of a Chinese surveillance balloon highlights the increasing distrust and structural tensions between the U.S. and China. It also shows the fragility of efforts to put a floor under the relationship, as Presidents Biden and Xi attempted at recent G-20 meeting. Taiwan is a key flashpoint. Xi reaffirmed his intention to unify Taiwan with the mainland at last year’s National Party Congress. The U.S. Congress is likely to support closer Taiwan relations - including a possible visit by Speaker Kevin McCarthy this year - elevating tensions. We do not see military action in the near term but expect the risk to increase over time. China can take a range of steps short of military action to pressure Taiwan. | |
Major cyberattack(s) | Cyberattacks cause sustained disruption to critical physical and digital infrastructure. | High | We see the pace of cyber attacks increasing as the Russia-Ukraine conflict persists. Critical government and private sector networks, as well as infrastructure, are vulnerable to hacking and spying. Attacks are increasing in scope, scale and sophistication. The U.S. government is pushing for more protection requirements. Repeated attacks could cause significant damage and disruption that could spill over to financial markets and the economy. | |
Global technology decoupling | Technology decoupling between the U.S. and China significantly accelerates in scale and scope. | High | Strategic competition between the U.S. and China is driving global fragmentation as both focus on boosting self-reliance, reducing vulnerabilities and decoupling their tech sectors. We see unprecedented U.S. semiconductor export restrictions against China accelerating the decoupling. Japan and the Netherlands appear set to roll out similar measures. The U.S. is weighing additional export controls on other technologies like quantum and AI, as well as a mechanism to review investments in China. The U.S. has enacted the CHIPS and Science Act aimed at boosting competitiveness in critical technologies. Technology was a focus of China’s 20th Party Congress, highlighting the drive for self-sufficiency. | |
Gulf tensions | Iran nuclear talks collapse, and tensions escalate, raising the risk of a regional conflict. | High | Negotiations toward a revived nuclear deal have ground to halt, and U.S. leaders have said it’s no longer a priority. In addition, Iran’s military cooperation with Russia and support for militant groups in the region are exacerbating tensions. The closer Iran now gets to being able to produce and deploy a nuclear weapon, the higher the likelihood of military action against Iran. The drone attack against a military facility—reportedly by Israel—in the Iranian city of Isfahan underscores this. The risk of military attack may be at its highest in a decade. There has been a general de-escalation of tensions among Gulf oil producers, who have benefited from high energy prices. The Abraham Accords and diplomatic efforts by the U.S. administration are enhancing cooperation between Israel and Arab states. | |
Emerging markets political crisis | Ripple effects from the Ukraine crisis severely stress EM political systems and institutions. | Medium | Falling inflation, the slowing pace of U.S. interest rate hikes and a weaker U.S. dollar will reduce financial pressures on emerging markets this year, in our view. We see China’s reopening further supporting EM economies. Still, slowing global growth will prove a drag. We expect divergence. Some EMs, like Brazil and Mexico, hiked rates and tightened fiscal policies early and may be able to ease policies this year. Others, mainly in Africa, have engaged with the IMF and can better absorb global shocks. We see commodity exporters as generally well buffered. | |
Major terror attack(s) | A terror attack leads to significant loss of life and commercial disruption. | Medium | Al-Qaida has been slow to reorganize following the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri, but remains a significant threat. Additionally, ISIS is undergoing a resurgence in Afghanistan, raising the risk of foreign fighters returning to their home countries and conducting attacks. This comes at a time when Western governments are focused on other policy priorities. In the U.S., the administration has underscored the growing risk of domestic terrorism, calling it the most serious and persistent terrorist threat to the homeland. We see the threat increasing amid a polarized U.S. political backdrop. | |
North Korea conflict | North Korea pushes ahead with its nuclear buildup and takes provocative actions such as missile launches. | Medium | North Korea has rebuffed talks with the U.S. and escalated provocations. This includes threatening rhetoric and record tests of short-range and intercontinental ballistic missile in 2022, with some increasingly close to South Korean and Japanese territory. South Korea and Japan are bolstering their defenses in response. We do not see an imminent threat of regional conflict but think tensions will worsen in 2023. This could include additional long-range missile tests, the further development of tactical weapons and a seventh nuclear test. We believe markets are underappreciating this risk. | |
Climate policy gridlock | Developed economies fail to increase public investment or take action to achieve net-zero emission targets. | Medium | The Ukraine war has brought energy security to the fore. The world will need more non-Russian fossil fuels in the near term, but we believe the crisis will accelerate the transition to a lower-carbon world in the long run. The energy shock will likely boost decarbonization plans in Europe amid a race for clean energy leadership, as the continent responds to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that is driving investment in the U.S. A divided U.S. Congress means the Biden administration will focus on implementation of the IRA and regulatory actions. Further legislative action is unlikely in the short-term, in our view. | |
European fragmentation | The energy crunch and inflationary pressures lead to a populist resurgence and economic volatility. | Low | The Ukraine war triggered a strong impulse toward European unity, as governments came together to sanction Russia and support Ukraine. Italy’s conservative government has so far avoided stoking tensions with the EU, and Brussels has shown openness to reform EU fiscal rules. Franco-German relations are improving. Europe has weathered the energy crisis this winter better than expected. We remain cautious of divisions emerging as the economic costs of the Ukraine war mount. Countries are still grappling with how to approach China in the increasingly competitive geopolitical environment. |
Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from Refinitiv. Data as of February 2023. Notes: The “risks” column lists the 10 key geopolitical risks that we track. The “description” column defines each risk. “Market attention” is a graphical snapshot of recent movement in the BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) for each risk. The BGRI measures the degree of the market’s attention to each risk, as reflected in brokerage reports and financial media. See the "methodology" tab for details. The table is sorted by the “Likelihood” column which represents our fundamental assessment, based on BlackRock’s subject matter experts, of the probability that each risk will be realized – either low, medium or high – in the near term. The “our view” column represents BlackRock’s most recent view on developments related to each risk. This is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds or security in particular. Individual portfolio managers for BlackRock may have opinions and/or make investment decisions that may, in certain respects, not be consistent with the information contained herein.
We have developed a market movement score for each risk that measures the degree to which asset prices have moved similarly to our risk scenarios, integrating insights from our Risk & Quantitative Analysis (RQA) team and their Market-Driven Scenario (MDS) shocks. We do this by estimating how “similar” the current market environment is to our expectation of what it would look like in the event the particular MDS was realized, also taking into account the magnitude of market moves. The far right of the horizontal axis indicates that the similarity between asset movements and what our MDS assumed is greatest; the middle of the axis means asset prices have shown little relationship to the MDS, and the far left indicates markets have behaved in the opposite way that our MDS anticipated.
Risk map
BlackRock Geopolitical market attention, market movement and likelihood
How to gauge the potential market impact of each of our top-10 risks? We have identified three key “scenario variables” for each – or assets that we believe would be most sensitive to a realization of that risk. The chart below shows the direction of our assumed price impact.
Geopolitical risk | Asset | Direction of assumed price impact |
---|---|---|
Russia-NATO conflict | Russian equities | |
Russian ruble | ||
Brent crude oil | ||
Global technology decoupling | Chinese yuan | |
U.S. investment grade | ||
Asia ex-Japan electrical | ||
Major cyberattack(s) | U.S. high yield utilities | |
U.S. dollar | ||
U.S. utilities sector | ||
Emerging markets political crisis | Latin America consumer staples sector | |
Emerging vs. developed equities | ||
Brazil debt | ||
U.S.-China strategic competition | Taiwanese dollar | |
Taiwanese equities | ||
China high yield | ||
Major terror attack(s) | Germany 10-year government bond | |
Japanese yen | ||
Europe airlines sector | ||
North Korea conflict | Japanese yen | |
South Korean won | ||
South Korean equities | ||
Gulf tensions | Brent crude oil | |
VIX volatility index | ||
U.S. high yield credit | ||
Climate policy gridlock | U.S. building products sector | |
U.S. construction materials sector | ||
U.S. utilities sector | ||
European fragmentation | Italy 10-year government debt | |
EMEA hotels and leisure | ||
Russian rouble |
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from BlackRock’s Aladdin Portfolio Risk Tools application, February 2023. Notes: The table depicts the three assets that we see as key variables for each of our top-10 geopolitical risks – as well as the direction of the assumed shocks for each in the event of the risk materializing. The up arrow indicates a rise in prices (corresponding to a decline in yields for bonds); the down arrow indicates a fall in prices. Our analysis is based on similar historical events and current market conditions such as volatility and cross-asset correlations. See the “implied stress testing framework” section of the 2018 paper Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction for details. For illustrative purposes only. The scenarios are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds, strategy or security in particular.
We detail the key geopolitical events over the next year in the table below.
2023 | Location | Event |
---|---|---|
February | ||
February 1 | U.S. | Federal Reserve meeting |
February 2 | Euro area | European Central Bank meeting |
February 2 | UK | Bank of England meeting |
February 25 | Nigeria | General election |
March | ||
March 5 | China | Opening of National People’s Congress Annual Session |
March 16 | Euro area | European Central Bank meeting |
March 22 | U.S. | Federal Reserve meeting |
March 23 | UK | Bank of England meeting |
April | ||
April 2 | Finland | General election |
April 10-16 | U.S. | IMF/World Bank spring meetings |
April 28 | Japan | Bank of Japan meeting |
May | ||
May 3 | U.S. | Federal Reserve meeting |
May 4 | Euro area | European Central Bank meeting |
May 7 | Thailand | General election |
May 11 | UK | Bank of England meeting |
May 14 | Turkey | General election |
May 19-21 | Japan | G7 Leaders’ Summit |
June | ||
June 14 | U.S. | Federal Reserve meeting |
June 15 | Euro area | European Central Bank meeting |
June 22 | UK | Bank of England meeting |
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, January 2023.
Note: European Central Bank meetings shown are those accompanied by press conferences. The Bank of Japan events shown are followed by the publication of the central bank’s outlook report.
The quantitative components of our geopolitical risk dashboard incorporate two different measures of risk: the first based on the market attention to risk events, the second on the market movement related to these events.
The BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) tracks the relative frequency of brokerage reports (via Refinitiv) and financial news stories (Dow Jones News) associated with specific geopolitical risks. We adjust for whether the sentiment in the text of articles is positive or negative, and then assign a score. This score reflects the level of market attention to each risk versus a 5-year history. We use a shorter historical window for our COVID-19 risk due to its limited age. We assign a heavier weight to brokerage reports than other media sources since we want to measure the market's attention to any particular risk, not the public’s.
Our updated methodology improves upon traditional “text mining” approaches that search articles for predetermined key words associated with each risk. Instead, we take a big data approach based on machine-learning. Huge advances in computing power now make it possible to use language models based on neural networks. These help us sift through vast data sets to estimate the relevance of every sentence in an article to the geopolitical risks we measure.
How does it work? First we “train” the language model with broad geopolitical content and articles representative of each individual risk we track. The pre-trained language model then focuses on two tasks when trawling though millions of brokerage reports and financial news stories:
The attention and sentiment scores are aggregated to produce a composite geopolitical risk score. A zero score represents the average BGRI level over its history. A score of one means the BGRI level is one standard deviation above its historical average, implying above-average market attention to the risk. We weigh recent readings more heavily in calculating the average. The level of the BGRIs changes slowly over time even if market attention remains constant. This is to reflect the concept that a consistently high level of market attention eventually becomes “normal.”
Our language model helps provide more nuanced analysis of the relevance of a given article than traditional methods would allow. Example: Consider an analyst report with boilerplate language at the end listing a variety of different geopolitical risks. A simple keyword-based approach may suggest the article is more relevant than it really is; our new machine learning approach seeks to do a better job at adjusting for the context of the sentences – and determining their true relevance to the risk at hand.
In the market movement measure, we use Market-Driven Scenarios (MDS) associated with each geopolitical risk event as a baseline for how market prices would respond to the realization of the risk event.
Our MDS framework forms the basis for our scenarios and estimates of their potential one-month impact on global assets. The first step is a precise definition of our scenarios – and well-defined catalysts (or escalation triggers) for their occurrence. We then use an econometric framework to translate the various scenario outcomes into plausible shocks to a global set of market indexes and risk factors.
The size of the shocks is calibrated by various techniques, including analysis of historical periods that resemble the risk scenario. Recent historical parallels are assigned greater weight. Some of the scenarios we envision do not have precedents – and many have only imperfect ones. This is why we integrate the views of BlackRock’s experts in geopolitical risk, portfolio management, and Risk and Quantitative Analysis into our framework. See the 2018 paper Market Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction for details. MDS are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving.
We then compile a market movement index for each risk.* This is composed of two parts:
These two measures are combined to create an index that works as follows:
*This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds, strategy or security in particular. The scenarios are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving.