INVESTMENT INSIGHTS
Our thought leadership in investing, risk management, portfolio construction and trading solutions.
BLACKROCK SUSTAINABILITY
Please read this page before proceeding as it explains certain restrictions imposed by law on the distribution of this information and the jurisdictions in which our products and services are authorised to be offered or sold.
By entering this site, you are agreeing that you have reviewed and agreed to the terms contained herein, including any legal or regulatory restrictions, and have consented to the collection, use and disclosure of your personal data as set out in the Privacy section referred to below.
By confirming below, you also acknowledge that you:
(i) have read this important information;
(ii) agree your access to this website is subject to the disclaimer, risk warnings and other information set out herein; and
(iii) are the relevant sophistication level and/or type of audience intended for your respective country or jurisdiction identified below.
The information contained on this website (this “Website”) (including without limitation the information, functions and documents posted herein (together, the “Contents”) is made available for informational purposes only.
No Offer
The Contents have been prepared without regard to the investment objectives, financial situation, or means of any person or entity, and the Website is not soliciting any action based upon them.
This material should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities and does not constitute an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where or to any persons to whom it would be unauthorized or unlawful to do so.
Access Subject to Local Restrictions
The Website is intended for the following audiences in each respective country or region: In the U.S.: public distribution. In Canada: public distribution. In the UK and outside the EEA: professional clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and qualified investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons. In the EEA, professional clients, qualified clients, and qualified investors. For qualified investors in Switzerland, qualified investors as defined in the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006, as amended. In DIFC: 'Professional Clients’ and no other person should rely upon the information contained within it. In Singapore, public distribution. In Hong Kong, public distribution. In South Korea, Qualified Professional Investors (as defined in the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act and its sub-regulations). In Taiwan, Professional Investors. In Japan, Professional Investors only (Professional Investor is defined in Financial Instruments and Exchange Act). In Australia, public distribution. In China, this may not be distributed to individuals resident in the People's Republic of China ("PRC", for such purposes, excluding Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) or entities registered in the PRC unless such parties have received all the required PRC government approvals to participate in any investment or receive any investment advisory or investment management services. For Other APAC Countries, Institutional Investors only (or professional/sophisticated /qualified investors, as such term may apply in local jurisdictions). In Latin America, institutional investors and financial intermediaries only (not for public distribution).
This Contents are not intended for, or directed to, persons in any countries or jurisdictions that are not enumerated above, or to an audience other than as specified above.
This Website has not been, and will not be submitted to become, approved/verified by, or registered with, any relevant government authorities under the local laws. This Website is not intended for and should not be accessed by persons located or resident in any jurisdiction where (by reason of that person's nationality, domicile, residence or otherwise) the publication or availability of this Website is prohibited or contrary to local law or regulation or would subject any BlackRock entity to any registration or licensing requirements in such jurisdiction.
It is your responsibility to be aware of, to obtain all relevant regulatory approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations under, and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction in connection with your access. If you are unsure about the meaning of any of the information provided, please consult your financial or other professional adviser.
No Warranty
The Contents are published in good faith but no advice, representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by BlackRock or by any person as to its adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or that it is fit for your particular purpose, and it should not be relied on as such. The Contents do not purport to be complete and is subject to change. You acknowledge that certain information contained in this Website supplied by third parties may be incorrect or incomplete, and such information is provided on an "AS IS" basis. We reserve the right to change, modify, add, or delete, any content and the terms of use of this Website without notice. Users are advised to periodically review the contents of this Website to be familiar with any modifications. The Website has not made, and expressly disclaims, any representations with respect to any forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future.
No information on this Website constitutes business, financial, investment, trading, tax, legal, regulatory, accounting or any other advice. If you are unsure about the meaning of any information provided, please consult your financial or other professional adviser.
No Liability
BlackRock shall have no liability for any loss or damage arising in connection with this Website or out of the use, inability to use or reliance on the Contents by any person, including without limitation, any loss of profit or any other damage, direct or consequential, regardless of whether they arise from contractual or tort (including negligence) or whether BlackRock has foreseen such possibility, except where such exclusion or limitation contravenes the applicable law.
You may leave this Website when you access certain links on this Website. BlackRock has not examined any of these websites and does not assume any responsibility for the contents of such websites nor the services, products or items offered through such websites.
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright, trademark and other forms of proprietary rights protect the Contents of this Website. All Contents are owned or controlled by BlackRock or the party credited as the provider of the Content. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Website should be considered as granting any licence or right under any copyright, patent or trademark or other intellectual property rights of BlackRock or any third party.
This Website is for your personal use. As a user, you must not sell, copy, publish, distribute, transfer, modify, display, reproduce, and/or create any derivative works from the information or software on this Website. You must not redeliver any of the pages, text, images, or content of this Website using "framing" or similar technology. Systematic retrieval of content from this Website to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory (whether through robots, spiders, automatic devices or manual processes) or creating links to this Website is strictly prohibited. You acknowledge that you have no right to use the content of this Website in any other manner.
Additional Information
Investment involves risks. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase.
Privacy
Your name, email address and other personal details will be processed in accordance with BlackRock’s Privacy Policy for your specific country which you may read by accessing our website at https://www.blackrock.com.
Please note that you are required to read and accept the terms of our Privacy Policy before you are able to access our websites.
Once you have confirmed that you agree to the legal information herein, and the Privacy Policy – by indicating your consent – we will place a cookie on your computer to recognise you and prevent this page from reappearing should you access this site, or other BlackRock sites, on future occasions. The cookie will expire after six months, or sooner should there be a material change to this important information.
The global BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) aims to capture overall market attention to geopolitical risks, as the line chart shows. The indicator is a simple average of our top-10 risks. The indicator sits close to its historical average. With a range of risks on the horizon, we believe markets may be underappreciating the potential market impact of geopolitical events.
We keep our U.S.-China strategic competition risk rating at a high level. The trajectory of relations remains negative and presents significant risks for investors. A series of visits by senior U.S. officials to China shows that leaders are seeking to put a floor under the relationship. We believe any thaw will be fragile though, subject to events and actions by both sides. We maintain a high likelihood of Gulf tensions, but several recent positive developments have reduced frictions among the key players. The principal risk remains a military confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program. We reinforce our high likelihood rating for the Russia-NATO conflict. In Ukraine, we do not see a diplomatic solution in the near term. The failed mutiny in Russia raises concerns about the regime’s long-term stability.
Risk | Description | Market attention since 2019 | Likelihood | Our view |
---|---|---|---|---|
U.S.-China strategic competition | China takes military action against Taiwan or asserts claims in the South China Sea by force. | High | We see U.S.-China relations on a negative trajectory. A series of visits by senior U.S. officials to China shows leaders are seeking to put a floor under the relationship. Any thaw is likely to be fragile and subject to events and actions of both sides. The risk of accidental or intentional escalation is high, in our view. Taiwan remains the biggest flashpoint. We believe the U.S. Congress and some presidential candidates will keep pressing for increased support for and closer relations with Taiwan, raising tensions. We do not see military action in the near term but see the risk increasing over time. China has demonstrated a willingness to pressure Taiwan, presenting risks for investors. An important milestone will be the Taiwan presidential elections in January 2024. | |
Russia-NATO conflict | The war in Ukraine becomes protracted, raising the risk of escalation with NATO. Western financial, energy and technology sanctions on Russia continue to mount. | High | Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the largest, most dangerous military conflict in Europe since WWII. We do not see a diplomatic solution in the near term. Russia’s spring offensive underwhelmed, and Ukraine’s counter-offensive is making slow progress. An extended war of attrition is likely, and the failed mutiny in Russia raises concerns about the regime’s long-term stability. There is a significant risk of accidental or intentional escalation. The most likely long-term outcome is a political, economic and military standoff between the West and Russia. Despite not admitting Ukraine as a NATO member, Western allies set forth a long-term commitment to Ukraine’s security, essentially making Ukraine a de-facto member of the Western security umbrella. Ukraine will also require Western economic support over the long term. | |
Major cyber attack(s) | Cyber attacks cause sustained disruption to critical physical and digital infrastructure. | High | We see cyber attacks increasing in scope, scale and sophistication amid mounting geopolitical competition and rapid technological advancement. Critical government and private sector networks and infrastructure are vulnerable. Artificial intelligence (AI) could dramatically alter the threat landscape, increasing the risk of attacks and misinformation, while also providing defensive tools. Repeated attacks could cause significant economic and market disruption. The U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy classifies ransomware as a national security threat and calls for more regulation and minimum standards for an expanded number of sectors. | |
Global technology decoupling | Technology decoupling between the U.S. and China significantly accelerates in scale and scope. | High | Strategic competition between the U.S. and China is driving global fragmentation as the two pursue targeted decoupling, focused especially on technology. The U.S. is likely to adopt additional controls limiting China’s access to key technologies, including semiconductors, cloud computing, quantum and AI, and will likely implement a mechanism to review outbound investment in select Chinese technologies. U.S. allies in Europe and Japan are pursuing similar measures. Beijing has reinforced the importance of technological self-sufficiency and taken steps to respond to U.S. measures, including announcing export controls on metals key to advanced technologies. | |
Gulf tensions | Iran nuclear talks collapse, and tensions escalate, raising the risk of a regional conflict. | High | There has been a general de-escalation of tensions in the region, including a restoration of diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran as well as between Syria and members of the Arab League. The Abraham Accords and U.S. diplomatic efforts are enhancing cooperation between Israel and Arab states. However, increasing violence in the West Bank and Gaza could inhibit further progress. Confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program remains a significant risk. We do not see a revived nuclear deal as likely, but informal efforts to limit Iran’s nuclear program could ease tensions. The closer Iran gets to being able to produce and deploy a nuclear weapon, the higher the likelihood of military action against Iran, in our view. | |
Major terror attack(s) | A terror attack leads to significant loss of life and commercial disruption. | Medium | Al-Qaida has reorganized under new leadership and remains a threat. The group’s relationship with the Taliban in Afghanistan is of particular concern for Western officials. ISIS is also resurgent in Afghanistan and in Syria, increasing the risk of attacks on Western targets domestically and abroad at a time when Western governments are focused on other policy priorities. The U.S. administration has underscored the growing risk of domestic terrorism, calling it the most serious and persistent terrorist threat to the homeland. We see the threat increasing given a polarized U.S. political backdrop and the 2024 presidential election. | |
Emerging markets political crisis | Ripple effects from the Ukraine crisis severely stress EM political systems and institutions. | Medium | The slowing pace of U.S. interest rate hikes and the weaker U.S. dollar have eased pressures on EMs. Challenges include the slowdown in global economic activity, China’s restart losing steam, and the long-term costs of fragmentation. We expect divergence in EM outcomes. Some middle-income EMs, like Brazil and Mexico, may be able to ease policies and offset downward growth pressures. EMs with high debt levels such as Egypt and Pakistan could face hurdles. We worry about a lack of global cooperation on debt relief. ASEAN countries could benefit from shifting trade patterns caused by U.S.-China tensions. | |
North Korea conflict | North Korea pushes ahead with its nuclear buildup and takes provocative actions such as missile launches. | Medium | North Korea has rebuffed talks with the U.S. and escalated provocations. This includes threatening rhetoric, public rallies, record numbers of missile tests, an attempt to launch a military reconnaissance satellite, and exhibits of new weapons capabilities. South Korea and Japan are bolstering defenses in response, and the U.S. has deployed its largest nuclear-armed submarine to South Korea as a deterrent. We do not see an imminent threat of regional conflict but think tensions will worsen this year. This could include more long-range missile tests, further development of tactical weapons and a seventh nuclear test. We believe markets are underappreciating this risk. | |
Climate policy gridlock | Developed economies fail to increase public investment or take action to achieve net-zero emission targets. | Medium | The Ukraine war has brought energy security to the fore, but we believe the crisis will also accelerate the transition to a lower-carbon world. The energy shock will likely boost decarbonization plans in Europe amid a race for clean energy leadership, as the continent responds to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that is driving investment in the U.S. Though the IRA’s provisions are stoking tensions between the U.S. and its allies, we believe the legislation will ultimately be catalytic for increasing global investment in clean energy. A divided U.S. Congress means further U.S. legislative action is unlikely in the short term. Multilateral organizations are under pressure to adopt climate finance reforms ahead of COP28 in November. | |
European fragmentation | The energy crunch and inflationary pressures lead to a populist resurgence and economic volatility. | Low | The war in Ukraine triggered a strong impulse toward European unity. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act also has motivated European capitals on supporting domestic industry in the global race for clean tech leadership. Progress has been made on reforming EU fiscal rules, with a possible deal by year end. A coalition government collapse in the Netherlands highlights the divisive nature of immigration, yet the recently agreed EU migration deal marks a positive step. The EU is considering measures to restrict exports and investment to China. We expect debate on the final scope, but the bloc is largely aligned on the need to de-risk from China, in our view. |
Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from Refinitiv. Data as of July 2023. Notes: The “risks” column lists the 10 key geopolitical risks that we track. The “description” column defines each risk. “Market attention” is a graphical snapshot of recent movement in the BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) for each risk. The BGRI measures the degree of the market’s attention to each risk, as reflected in brokerage reports and financial media. See the "methodology" tab for details. The table is sorted by the “Likelihood” column which represents our fundamental assessment, based on BlackRock’s subject matter experts, of the probability that each risk will be realized – either low, medium or high – in the near term. The “our view” column represents BlackRock’s most recent view on developments related to each risk. This is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds or security in particular. Individual portfolio managers for BlackRock may have opinions and/or make investment decisions that may, in certain respects, not be consistent with the information contained herein.
We have developed a market movement score for each risk that measures the degree to which asset prices have moved similarly to our risk scenarios, integrating insights from our Risk & Quantitative Analysis (RQA) team and their Market-Driven Scenario (MDS) shocks. We do this by estimating how “similar” the current market environment is to our expectation of what it would look like in the event the particular MDS was realized, also taking into account the magnitude of market moves. The far right of the horizontal axis indicates that the similarity between asset movements and what our MDS assumed is greatest; the middle of the axis means asset prices have shown little relationship to the MDS, and the far left indicates markets have behaved in the opposite way that our MDS anticipated.
Risk map
BlackRock Geopolitical market attention, market movement and likelihood
How to gauge the potential market impact of each of our top-10 risks? We have identified three key “scenario variables” for each – or assets that we believe would be most sensitive to a realization of that risk. The chart below shows the direction of our assumed price impact.
Geopolitical risk | Asset | Direction of assumed price impact |
---|---|---|
U.S.-China strategic competition | Taiwanese dollar | |
Taiwanese equities | ||
China high yield | ||
Russia-NATO conflict | Russian equities | |
Russian ruble | ||
Brent crude oil | ||
Major cyber attack(s) | U.S. high yield utilities | |
U.S. dollar | ||
U.S. utilities sector | ||
Global technology decoupling | Chinese yuan | |
U.S. investment grade | ||
Asia ex-Japan electrical | ||
Gulf tensions | Brent crude oil | |
VIX volatility index | ||
U.S. high yield credit | ||
Major terror attack(s) | Germany 10-year government bond | |
Japanese yen | ||
Europe airlines sector | ||
Emerging markets political crisis | Latin America consumer staples sector | |
Emerging vs. developed equities | ||
Brazil debt | ||
North Korea conflict | Japanese yen | |
South Korean won | ||
South Korean equities | ||
Climate policy gridlock | U.S. building products sector | |
U.S. construction materials sector | ||
U.S. utilities sector | ||
European fragmentation | Italy 10-year government debt | |
EMEA hotels and leisure | ||
Russian rouble |
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from BlackRock’s Aladdin Portfolio Risk Tools application, July 2023. Notes: The table depicts the three assets that we see as key variables for each of our top-10 geopolitical risks – as well as the direction of the assumed shocks for each in the event of the risk materializing. The up arrow indicates a rise in prices (corresponding to a decline in yields for bonds); the down arrow indicates a fall in prices. Our analysis is based on similar historical events and current market conditions such as volatility and cross-asset correlations. See the “implied stress testing framework” section of the 2018 paper Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction for details. For illustrative purposes only. The scenarios are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds, strategy or security in particular.
We detail the key geopolitical events over the next year in the table below.
2023 | Location | Event |
---|---|---|
September | ||
September 13-30 | U.S. | UN General Assembly |
September 13 | Brussels | European Commission State of the Union |
September 14 | Euro Area | European Central Bank Meeting |
September 20 | U.S. | Federal Reserve Meeting |
September 21 | UK | Bank of England Meeting |
September 28 | France | IEA Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Summit |
September 30 | U.S. | End of fiscal year |
TBD | China | Politburo Meeting |
October | ||
October 13-15 | Morocco | IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings |
October 14 | New Zealand | General Election |
October 22 | Switzerland | General Election |
October 22 | Argentina | General Election |
October 26 | Euro Area | European Central Bank Meeting |
October 26-27 | Euro Area | European Council Meeting |
October 31 | Japan | Bank of Japan Meeting |
TBD | China | CPC Central Committee Third Plenum |
TBD | China | Politburo Quarterly Economic Policy Meeting |
TBD | China | Belt and Road Summit |
November | ||
November 1 | U.S. | Federal Reserve Meeting |
November 1-2 | UK | Global Summit on AI Safety |
November 2 | UK | Bank of England Meeting |
November 7 | U.S. | Gubernatorial Elections |
November 12-18 | U.S. | APEC Leaders’ Summit |
November 22 | Netherlands | General Election |
November 30- December 12 | UAE | COP28 |
TBD | China | Politburo Meeting |
December | ||
December 1 | G20 | Brazil G20 President Begins |
December 13 | U.S. | Federal Reserve Meeting |
December 14 | Euro Area | European Central Bank Meeting |
December 14 | UK | Bank of England Meeting |
December 14-15 | Euro Area | European Council Meeting |
TBD | China | Politburo Annual Economic Policy Meeting |
TBD | China | Central Economic Work Conference |
January 2024 | ||
January 1 | G7 | Italy G7 Presidency Begins |
January 1 | Euro Area | Belgian EU Council Presidency Begins |
January 13 | Taiwan | Presidential and Legislative Elections |
January 15-19 | Switzerland | World Economic Forum Annual Meeting |
January 23 | Japan | Bank of Japan Meeting |
January 25 | Euro Area | European Central Bank Meeting |
January 31 | U.S. | Federal Reserve Meeting |
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute, August 2023.
Note: European Central Bank meetings shown are those accompanied by press conferences. The Bank of Japan events shown are followed by the publication of the central bank’s outlook report.
The quantitative components of our geopolitical risk dashboard incorporate two different measures of risk: the first based on the market attention to risk events, the second on the market movement related to these events.
The BlackRock Geopolitical Risk Indicator (BGRI) tracks the relative frequency of brokerage reports (via Refinitiv) and financial news stories (Dow Jones News) associated with specific geopolitical risks. We adjust for whether the sentiment in the text of articles is positive or negative, and then assign a score. This score reflects the level of market attention to each risk versus a 5-year history. We use a shorter historical window for our COVID-19 risk due to its limited age. We assign a heavier weight to brokerage reports than other media sources since we want to measure the market's attention to any particular risk, not the public’s.
Our updated methodology improves upon traditional “text mining” approaches that search articles for predetermined key words associated with each risk. Instead, we take a big data approach based on machine-learning. Huge advances in computing power now make it possible to use language models based on neural networks. These help us sift through vast data sets to estimate the relevance of every sentence in an article to the geopolitical risks we measure.
How does it work? First we “train” the language model with broad geopolitical content and articles representative of each individual risk we track. The pre-trained language model then focuses on two tasks when trawling though millions of brokerage reports and financial news stories:
The attention and sentiment scores are aggregated to produce a composite geopolitical risk score. A zero score represents the average BGRI level over its history. A score of one means the BGRI level is one standard deviation above its historical average, implying above-average market attention to the risk. We weigh recent readings more heavily in calculating the average. The level of the BGRIs changes slowly over time even if market attention remains constant. This is to reflect the concept that a consistently high level of market attention eventually becomes “normal.”
Our language model helps provide more nuanced analysis of the relevance of a given article than traditional methods would allow. Example: Consider an analyst report with boilerplate language at the end listing a variety of different geopolitical risks. A simple keyword-based approach may suggest the article is more relevant than it really is; our new machine learning approach seeks to do a better job at adjusting for the context of the sentences – and determining their true relevance to the risk at hand.
In the market movement measure, we use Market-Driven Scenarios (MDS) associated with each geopolitical risk event as a baseline for how market prices would respond to the realization of the risk event.
Our MDS framework forms the basis for our scenarios and estimates of their potential one-month impact on global assets. The first step is a precise definition of our scenarios – and well-defined catalysts (or escalation triggers) for their occurrence. We then use an econometric framework to translate the various scenario outcomes into plausible shocks to a global set of market indexes and risk factors.
The size of the shocks is calibrated by various techniques, including analysis of historical periods that resemble the risk scenario. Recent historical parallels are assigned greater weight. Some of the scenarios we envision do not have precedents – and many have only imperfect ones. This is why we integrate the views of BlackRock’s experts in geopolitical risk, portfolio management, and Risk and Quantitative Analysis into our framework. See the 2018 paper Market Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction for details. MDS are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving.
We then compile a market movement index for each risk.* This is composed of two parts:
These two measures are combined to create an index that works as follows:
*This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any funds, strategy or security in particular. The scenarios are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect all possible outcomes as geopolitical risks are ever-evolving.